Literature DB >> 21968247

Use of primary radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Netherlands between 1997 and 2008: a population-based study.

J J Jobsen1, M J Aarts, S Siesling, J Klaase, W J Louwman, P M P Poortmans, M L M Lybeert, C C E Koning, H Struikmans, J W W Coebergh.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe variation in the utilisation rates of primary radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer in the Netherlands, focusing on time trends and age effects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on primary non-metastatic rectal cancer were derived from the population-based cancer registries of four comprehensive cancer centres (regions) in the Netherlands (1997-2008, n=13,055).
RESULTS: An increase in the utilisation rate was noted for the four regions, from 37-46% in 1997 to 66-76% in 2008, for both genders. This increase was found predominately for preoperative radiotherapy (from 13-31% to 58-67%) and (unsurprisingly) was most pronounced for stage T2-3 patients (from 9-27% to 68-80%). The probability of receiving radiotherapy decreased with age: the odds of receiving preoperative radiotherapy was reduced in patients aged 65 years and older, as well as the odds of receiving postoperative radiotherapy in those aged 75 years and older, which remained significant after adjustment for stage, gender and region. Regional differences persisted in multivariable analyses, i.e. the odds of receiving preoperative radiotherapy was reduced in two regions: odds ratio: 0.4 (95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.5) and 0.7 (0.6-0.8). The odds of receiving postoperative radiotherapy was significantly increased in these regions [odds ratio: 2.6 (2.2-3.2) and 1.6 (1.3-1.9), respectively] and reduced in another [odds ratio 0.8 (0.6-0.96)].
CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation rate of radiotherapy for rectal cancer increased significantly over time, particularly for preoperative radiotherapy and was most pronounced for T2-3 patients. Due to national multidisciplinary treatment guidelines, regional differences became limited in recent years after adjustment for age and stage of the disease. A low utilisation rate of radiotherapy was seen in women and elderly patients.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968247     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  6 in total

1.  Years of Life Lost for Older Patients After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Federico Mazzotti; Alessandro Cucchetti; Yvette H M Claassen; Amanda C R K Bos; Esther Bastiaannet; Giorgio Ercolani; Jan Willem T Dekker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: adherence to evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice.

Authors:  Timothy L Fitzgerald; Tithe Biswas; Kevin O'Brien; Emmanuel E Zervos; Jan H Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Trends with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and clinical staging for those with rectal malignancies.

Authors:  Sanjay S Reddy; Beth Handorf; Jeffrey M Farma; Elin R Sigurdson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Nelleke P M Brouwer; Amanda C R K Bos; Valery E P P Lemmens; Pieter J Tanis; Niek Hugen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Johannes H W de Wilt; Rob H A Verhoeven
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Factors affecting radiotherapy utilisation in geriatric oncology patients in NSW, Australia.

Authors:  Penny Mackenzie; Claire Vajdic; Geoff Delaney; Gabriel Gabriel; Meera Agar; Tracy Comans; Michael Barton
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-13

6.  Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.

Authors:  E J A Morris; P J Finan; K Spencer; I Geh; A Crellin; P Quirke; J D Thomas; S Lawton; R Adams; D Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.