Literature DB >> 21967955

Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.

Chan A Chang1, Henry W Fields, Frank Michael Beck, Nathan C Springer, Allen R Firestone, Stephen Rosenstiel, James C Christensen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delivering an attractive smile is a key element in orthodontic patient satisfaction. Smile characteristics can be affected by the facial context. The purpose of this study was to investigate smile esthetics related to facial attractiveness and sex of the model.
METHODS: Attractive, average, and unattractive model faces (2 of each; 3 male, 3 female) determined by peer ratings were combined with 10 smile variables (buccal corridor, smile arc, maxillary gingival discrepancy, gingival display, incisal-edge discrepancy, cant, overbite, central-incisor gingival margin discrepancy, and maxillary midline to face, and maxillary midline to mandibular midline). Each smile characteristic was altered digitally and presented with slider technology to allow a continuous range of choices. Raters chose the ideal and the limits of acceptability. The variables were divided into 6 separate surveys and rated 96 times. Reliability was assessed by answering each question twice.
RESULTS: Individual smile variable reliability ranged from fair to excellent, except for the buccal corridor. Clinically significant values were defined as greater than 1.0 mm with statistical significance (P <0.05). Rater sex did not make a difference. Clinical significance was found for smile arc, gingival display, and maxillary midline to face. For females, accentuated smile arcs were preferred for the unattractive and attractive models compared with the average models. The opposite was found for male models. More gingival display was preferred for the attractive and unattractive male and female models compared with the average models. Attractive models were allowed less midline deviation.
CONCLUSIONS: Facial attractiveness and model sex impacted smile variables with a facial context, except for occlusal cant. These smile characteristics with a facial context should be considered when diagnosing and planning treatment for an orthodontic patient.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967955     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  15 in total

1.  Association of overjet and overbite with esthetic impairments of oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ira Sierwald; Mike T John; Oliver Schierz; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?

Authors:  Ahmad M Hamdan; Shannon M Lewis; Kevin E Kelleher; Sherif N Elhady; Steven J Lindauer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  An evaluation of the influence of teeth and the labial soft tissues on the perceived aesthetics of a smile.

Authors:  M Y S Chan; S B Mehta; S Banerji
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Analysis of smile esthetics in American Board of Orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Sercan Akyalcin; Leslie K Frels; Jeryl D English; Stephen Laman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Perception of Laypeople and Dental Professionals of Smile Esthetics.

Authors:  Aida Saffarpour; Maryam Ghavam; Anna Saffarpour; Rozita Dayani; Mohammad Javad Kharazi Fard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-03

6.  Total intrusion and distalization of the maxillary arch to improve smile esthetics.

Authors:  Eui Seon Baek; Soonshin Hwang; Kyung-Ho Kim; Chooryung J Chung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons.

Authors:  Jamille Barros Ferreira; Licínio Esmeraldo da Silva; Márcia Tereza de Oliveira Caetano; Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

8.  Smile esthetics: Evaluation of long-term changes in the transverse dimension.

Authors:  Sercan Akyalcin; Kenner Misner; Jeryl D English; Wick G Alexander; J Moody Alexander; Ron Gallerano
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Smile esthetics from odontology students' perspectives.

Authors:  Pilar España; Beatriz Tarazona; Vanessa Paredes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Rehabilitation with implant-retained removable dentures and its effects on perioral aesthetics: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Saturnino Marco Lupi; Matteo Cislaghi; Silvana Rizzo; Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2016-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.