Literature DB >> 21967825

'Animateurs' and animation: what makes a good commissioning manager?

Kath Checkland1, Stephanie Snow, Imelda McDermott, Stephen Harrison, Anna Coleman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the managerial behaviours adopted by commissioning managers in English primary care trusts (PCTs), and to explore the impact of these behaviours.
METHODS: Qualitative case studies were undertaken in four PCTs, focusing on staff engaged in the commissioning of hospital services. Both formal and informal observation were undertaken (150 hours), and 41 in-depth interviews conducted with managers and general practitioners (GPs).
RESULTS: Managers adopted many managerial behaviours familiar from the literature, including sharing information, and networking inside and outside the organization. Multiple organizational layers and unclear decision-making processes hindered this activity. In addition, some managers with responsibility for facilitating practice-based commissioning (PbC) adopted a managerial mode that we have called being an 'animateur'. This approach involved the active management of disparate groups of people over whom the manager had no authority, and appeared to be a factor in determining success. It was facilitated by managerial autonomy and was more prevalent where managers were seen to have legitimacy. Some organizational practices appeared to inhibit its development.
CONCLUSIONS: From 2012/13 it is planned that GPs will be taking more responsibility for commissioning in the English NHS. This research suggests that managers of the new commissioning organizations will require a deep and contextualized understanding of the NHS and that it is important that organizational processes do not inhibit managerial behaviour. Legitimacy may be an issue in contexts were managers are automatically transferred from their existing appointments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967825     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  6 in total

1.  Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Samuel Pannick; Thanos Athanasiou; Susannah J Long; Iain Beveridge; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Making the case for a fracture liaison service: a qualitative study of the experiences of clinicians and service managers.

Authors:  Sarah Drew; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Andrew Farmer; Laura Graham; M Kassim Javaid; Cyrus Cooper; Andrew Judge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The work of commissioning: a multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England's NHS.

Authors:  Sara E Shaw; Judith A Smith; Alison Porter; Rebecca Rosen; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Kathryn Oliver; Theo Lorenc; Simon Innvær
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-07-14

5.  Exploring commissioners' understandings of early primary care network development: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Lynsey Warwick-Giles; Jonathan Hammond; Simon Bailey; Kath Checkland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.302

6.  Evidence based policy making and the 'art' of commissioning - how English healthcare commissioners access and use information and academic research in 'real life' decision-making: an empirical qualitative study.

Authors:  Lesley Wye; Emer Brangan; Ailsa Cameron; John Gabbay; Jonathan H Klein; Catherine Pope
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.