BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes is one of the most common diseases during pregnancy. Despite this situation, there is still no consensus on methods for screening and diagnosis of this disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess perinatal outcomes of patients with gestational diabetes diagnosed using three different methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical observational, longitudinal, randomized trial at the National Institute of Perinatology Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes. We included all patients admitted to the Institute for a period of three months without pregestational diabetes. Patients were screened for gestational diabetes with an oral load of 50 g of glucose. Patients with a positive screen were randomized by a computer program that randomly chose patients and made a curve according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association 75 g or 100 g and another group with 75 g according to the criteria of the World Health Organization. Patients with gestational diabetes were followed throughout pregnancy until its reclassification in the puerperium. RESULTS: Screening was performed in 863 patients and 87 were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Perinatal outcomes were similar in patients with gestational diabetes diagnosed using different methods, but there was a higher frequency of pregnancy-induced hypertension in patients diagnosed with the curves of the American Diabetes Association 75 and 100 g compared with the curve of the World Health Organization. CONCLUSIONS: The American Diabetes Association diagnostic method as the World Health Organization are acceptable forms to diagnose gestational diabetes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Gestational diabetes is one of the most common diseases during pregnancy. Despite this situation, there is still no consensus on methods for screening and diagnosis of this disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess perinatal outcomes of patients with gestational diabetes diagnosed using three different methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical observational, longitudinal, randomized trial at the National Institute of Perinatology Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes. We included all patients admitted to the Institute for a period of three months without pregestational diabetes. Patients were screened for gestational diabetes with an oral load of 50 g of glucose. Patients with a positive screen were randomized by a computer program that randomly chose patients and made a curve according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association 75 g or 100 g and another group with 75 g according to the criteria of the World Health Organization. Patients with gestational diabetes were followed throughout pregnancy until its reclassification in the puerperium. RESULTS: Screening was performed in 863 patients and 87 were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Perinatal outcomes were similar in patients with gestational diabetes diagnosed using different methods, but there was a higher frequency of pregnancy-induced hypertension in patients diagnosed with the curves of the American Diabetes Association 75 and 100 g compared with the curve of the World Health Organization. CONCLUSIONS: The American Diabetes Association diagnostic method as the World Health Organization are acceptable forms to diagnose gestational diabetes.
Authors: Estela Blanco; Marcela Marin; Loreto Nuñez; Erika Retamal; Ximena Ossa; Katherine E Woolley; Tosin Oludotun; Suzanne E Bartington; Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit; Roy M Harrison; Pablo Ruiz-Rudolph; María Elisa Quinteros Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Date: 2022-05-02