| Literature DB >> 21966356 |
Mohammed Ahmed Yassin1, Roberta Petrucci, Kefyalew Taye Garie, Gregory Harper, Isabel Arbide, Melkamsew Aschalew, Yared Merid, Zelalem Kebede, Amin Ahmed Bawazir, Nabil Mohamed Abuamer, Luis Eduardo Cuevas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) is difficult in high TB burden settings. Interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 (IP10) has been suggested as a marker of TB infection and disease, but its ability to differentiate the two conditions remains uncertain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21966356 PMCID: PMC3179460 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow chart of study participants.
Characteristics of the study children.
| Variables | Symptomatic cases N = 295 | |||||
|
|
|
| Contacts N = 335 | Controls N = 156 | p | |
| Male/Female (% Male) | 13/15 (46.4) | 92/44 (67.6) | 67/64 (51.1) | 168/166 (50.3) | 79/77 (50.6) | |
| Median age (years) | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | <0.001 |
| Range | 1–15 | 1–15 | 1–15 | 1–15 | 1–15 | |
| Received BCG | 14 (63.6) | 69 (63.3) | 82 (70.7) | 249 (74.3) | 120 (76.9) | 0.01 |
| BCG scar present (%) | 7 (25) | 35 (25.7) | 51 (38.9) | 174 (51.9) | 93 (59.6) | <0.001 |
| Mean (SD) BCG scar (mm) | 7.4 (3.2) | 5.3 (1.8) | 5.5 (2.1) | 4.7 (2.4) | 5.4 (2.5) | <0.001 |
| Range | 4–13 | 2–9 | 2–10 | 1–13 | 2–13 | |
| HIV status, Pos/tested (%Pos) | 0/27 (0) | 14/114 (10.9) | 8/116 (6.5) | 27/231 (8.2) | 3/153 (1.9) | 0.005 |
| Mean (SD) residents/household | 8.3 (7.5) | 8.9 (8.3) | 7.2 (6.3) | 7.1 (2.6) | 6.4 (2.4) | 0.002 |
| Illiterate Father, N (%) | 17 (70.8) | 63 (55.8) | 55 (48.7) | 112 (38.6) | 87 (60.4) | <0.001 |
| Mother, N (%) | 21 (84) | 97 (77.6) | 87 (68.5) | 170 (52.3) | 123 (78.8) | <0.001 |
| Alive Father, N (%) | 24 (85.7) | 113 (83.1) | 113 (86.3) | 293 (88.3) | 144 (92.3) | 0.2 |
| Mother, N (%) | 25 (89.3) | 124 (92.5) | 128 (98.5) | 325 (97.6) | 156 (100) | <0.001 |
| Both parents, N (%) | 23 (82.1) | 109 (81.3) | 112 (80) | 293 (88) | 144 (92.3) | 0.01 |
TST and INFγ results and concordance among the tests by study group.
| Variables | Symptomatic cases N = 295 | ||||
|
|
|
| Contacts N = 335 (%) | Controls N = 156 (%) | |
| TST | |||||
| Positive | 22 (78.6) | 80 (59.3) | 37 (28.7) | 172 (54.1) | 20 (12.8) |
| Intermediate | 0 | 10 (7.4) | 9 (7) | 48 (15.1) | 15 (9.6) |
| Negative | 6 (21.4) | 45 (33.3) | 83 (64.3) | 98 (30.8) | 121 (77.6) |
| INFγ | |||||
| Positive | 16 (59.3) | 47 (37.6) | 34 (28.1) | 139 (44.7) | 20 (13.1) |
| Indeterminate | 5 (18.5) | 47 (37.6) | 44 (36.4) | 52 (16.7) | 25 (16.3) |
| Negative | 6 (22.2) | 31 (24.8) | 43 (35.5) | 120 (38.6) | 108 (70.6) |
| TST/INFγ concordance | |||||
| TST+/INFγ+ | 15 (68.2) | 38 (52.1) | 14 (20.6) | 87 (41.6) | 6 (5.3) |
| TST+/INFγ− | 3 (13.6) | 15 (20.5) | 10 (14.7) | 39 (18.7) | 10 (8.8) |
| TST−/INFγ+ | 1 (4.5) | 5 (6.8) | 15 (22.1) | 24 (11.5) | 12 (10.5) |
| TST−/INFγ− | 3 (13.6) | 15 (20.5) | 29 (42.6) | 59 (28.2) | 86 (75.4) |
Figure 2IP10 (pg/ml) concentrations in stimulated (Ag) and non-stimulated (Nil) samples by study group.
Box plots describe medians, interquantile values and range. Asterisks depict outliers.
Medians and interquantile ranges of IP10 concentrations (stimulated minus non-stimulated, in pg/ml) according to the TST and INFγ results by study group.
| TST | INFγ | |||||
| Positive | Intermediate | Negative | Positive | Indeterminate | Negative | |
| TB confirmed | 5116 (2092–9624) | - | 6788 (1672–11344) | 8848 (4296–11414) | 1672 (56–2092) | 4560 (8–7496) |
| TB probable | 2592 (64–8272) | 768 (0–7424) | 512 (84–3348) | 7254 (3360–10548) | 84 (0–604) | 1288 (140–4548) |
| TB unlikely | 2404 (326–8868) | 2903 (692–8688) | 674 (54–2558) | 7594 (3328–12028) | 548 (0–2208) | 674 (120–1372) |
| Contacts | 9304 (708–14536) | 6078 (476–17632) | 1486 (308–5544) | 13800 (11128–17728) | 348 (20–1932) | 770 (196–3224) |
| Controls | 528 (72–1392) | 1124 (40–2320) | 704 (116–1932) | 1784 (364–2562) | 180 (0–1184) | 684 (144–1792) |
Figure 3IP10 concentrations (stimulated minus non-stimulated) by TST and INFγ results and study group.
Box plots describe medians, interquantile values and range. Asterisks depict outliers.
Figure 4IP10 concentrations (stimulated minus non-stimulated) by HIV status and study group.
Box plots describe medians, interquantile values and range. Asterisks depict outliers.
Figure 5Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of IP10 in children with confirmed TB and contacts, when compared to community controls with TST- and INFγ results.