BACKGROUND: To validate a clinical algorithm for community health workers (CHWs) during routine household surveillance for neonatal illness in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: Surveillance was conducted in the intervention arm of a trial of newborn interventions. CHWs assessed 7587 neonates on postnatal days 0, 2, 5 and 8 and identified neonates with very severe disease (VSD) using an 11-sign algorithm. A nested prospective study was conducted to validate the algorithm (n=395). Physicians evaluated neonates to determine whether newborns with VSD needed referral. The authors calculated algorithm sensitivity and specificity in identifying (1) neonates needing referral and (2) mortality during the first 10 days of life. RESULTS: The 11-sign algorithm had sensitivity of 50.0% (95% CI 24.7% to 75.3%) and specificity of 98.4% (96.6% to 99.4%) for identifying neonates needing referral-level care. A simplified 6-sign algorithm had sensitivity of 81.3% (54.4% to 96.0%) and specificity of 96.0% (93.6% to 97.8%) for identifying referral need and sensitivity of 58.0% (45.5% to 69.8%) and specificity of 93.2% (92.5% to 93.7%) for screening mortality. Compared to our 6-sign algorithm, the Young Infant Study 7-sign (YIS7) algorithm with minor modifications had similar sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Community-based surveillance for neonatal illness by CHWs using a simple 6-sign clinical algorithm is a promising strategy to effectively identify neonates at risk of mortality and needing referral to hospital. The YIS7 algorithm was also validated with high sensitivity and specificity at community level, and is recommended for routine household surveillance for newborn illness. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00198627.
BACKGROUND: To validate a clinical algorithm for community health workers (CHWs) during routine household surveillance for neonatal illness in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: Surveillance was conducted in the intervention arm of a trial of newborn interventions. CHWs assessed 7587 neonates on postnatal days 0, 2, 5 and 8 and identified neonates with very severe disease (VSD) using an 11-sign algorithm. A nested prospective study was conducted to validate the algorithm (n=395). Physicians evaluated neonates to determine whether newborns with VSD needed referral. The authors calculated algorithm sensitivity and specificity in identifying (1) neonates needing referral and (2) mortality during the first 10 days of life. RESULTS: The 11-sign algorithm had sensitivity of 50.0% (95% CI 24.7% to 75.3%) and specificity of 98.4% (96.6% to 99.4%) for identifying neonates needing referral-level care. A simplified 6-sign algorithm had sensitivity of 81.3% (54.4% to 96.0%) and specificity of 96.0% (93.6% to 97.8%) for identifying referral need and sensitivity of 58.0% (45.5% to 69.8%) and specificity of 93.2% (92.5% to 93.7%) for screening mortality. Compared to our 6-sign algorithm, the Young Infant Study 7-sign (YIS7) algorithm with minor modifications had similar sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Community-based surveillance for neonatal illness by CHWs using a simple 6-sign clinical algorithm is a promising strategy to effectively identify neonates at risk of mortality and needing referral to hospital. The YIS7 algorithm was also validated with high sensitivity and specificity at community level, and is recommended for routine household surveillance for newborn illness. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00198627.
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Shams El Arifeen; Yoonjoung Choi; Sanwarul Bari; Syed M Rahman; Ishtiaq Mannan; Peter J Winch; A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed; Habibur Rahman Seraji; Nazma Begum; Robert E Black; Mathuram Santosham; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Yoonjoung Choi; Shams E Arifeen; Sanwarul Bari; Syed M Rahman; Ishtiaq Mannan; Habibur Rahman Seraji; Peter J Winch; Samir K Saha; A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed; Saifuddin Ahmed; Nazma Begum; Anne C C Lee; Robert E Black; Mathuram Santosham; Derrick Crook; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amal K Halder; Stephen P Luby; Shamima Akhter; Probir K Ghosh; Richard B Johnston; Leanne Unicomb Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Christopher John Gill; William B MacLeod; Grace Phiri-Mazala; Nicholas G Guerina; Mark Mirochnick; Anna B Knapp; Davidson H Hamer Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract Date: 2014-08-31