BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. In the general population, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and progression of CAC are predictors of future cardiac risk. We conducted a study to determine the progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients; we also examined the factors associated with progression and the impact of the analytic methods used to determine CAC progression. METHODS: We used multi-detector computed tomography to examine CAC in 150 prevalent renal transplant recipients, who did not have a documented cardiovascular disease. A baseline and a follow-up scan were performed and changes in CAC scores were evaluated in each patient individually, to calculate the incidence of CAC progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of CAC progression. RESULTS: Baseline CAC prevalence was 35.3% and the mean CAC score was 60.0 ± 174.8. At follow-up scan that was performed after an average of 2.8 ± 0.4 years, CAC prevalence increased to 64.6% and the mean CAC score to 94.9 ± 245.7. Progression of individual CAC score was found between 28.0 and 38.0%, depending on the method used to define progression. In patients with baseline CAC, median annualized rate of CAC progression was 11.1. Baseline CAC, high triglyceride and bisphosphonate use were the independent determinants of CAC progression. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation does not stop or reverse CAC. Progression of CAC is the usual evolution pattern of CAC in renal transplant recipients. Beside baseline CAC, high triglyceride level and bisphosphonate use were associated with progression of CAC.
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. In the general population, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and progression of CAC are predictors of future cardiac risk. We conducted a study to determine the progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients; we also examined the factors associated with progression and the impact of the analytic methods used to determine CAC progression. METHODS: We used multi-detector computed tomography to examine CAC in 150 prevalent renal transplant recipients, who did not have a documented cardiovascular disease. A baseline and a follow-up scan were performed and changes in CAC scores were evaluated in each patient individually, to calculate the incidence of CAC progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of CAC progression. RESULTS: Baseline CAC prevalence was 35.3% and the mean CAC score was 60.0 ± 174.8. At follow-up scan that was performed after an average of 2.8 ± 0.4 years, CAC prevalence increased to 64.6% and the mean CAC score to 94.9 ± 245.7. Progression of individual CAC score was found between 28.0 and 38.0%, depending on the method used to define progression. In patients with baseline CAC, median annualized rate of CAC progression was 11.1. Baseline CAC, high triglyceride and bisphosphonate use were the independent determinants of CAC progression. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation does not stop or reverse CAC. Progression of CAC is the usual evolution pattern of CAC in renal transplant recipients. Beside baseline CAC, high triglyceride level and bisphosphonate use were associated with progression of CAC.
Authors: Kultigin Turkmen; Fatih Mehmet Erdur; Ibrahim Guney; Huseyin Ozbiner; Aysun Toker; Abduzhappar Gaipov; Orhan Ozbek; Mehdi Yeksan; Halil Zeki Tonbul; Suleyman Turk Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Damiano Patrono; Robert Verhelst; Antoine Buemi; Pierre Goffette; Luc De Pauw; Nada Kanaan; Eric Goffin; Martine De Meyer; Michel Mourad Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.352