James R Griffiths1, Elizabeth M Kidney. 1. Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Emergency, Barnsley, UK. jamesgriffiths@nhs.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is recent evidence that the modified early warning scoring systems (MEWS) in the emergency department (ED) can identify patients at risk of deterioration. However, concerns remain that they are not sensitive enough to use as a risk assessment tool. OBJECTIVE: To assess use of MEWS in UK EDs. METHODS: A postal survey was undertaken of 254 adult EDs within the UK. Questionnaires were sent to the clinical lead at each department about their use of early warning scoring systems. RESULTS: Responses were received from 145 departments giving a response rate of 57%. 87% of respondents are currently using early warning scores (EWS). Of those, 80% are using MEWS. In 71% high EWS results in senior ED review, however in 25% it does not. Less than half of departments use high MEWS to trigger critical care input. 93% of respondents support using EWS in the ED. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of strong evidence, the majority of UK EDs are using EWS in some form. MEWS is the most commonly used but departments vary on their use of EWS for senior ED and/or critical care review. Over 90% of respondents in this survey support EWS in the ED.
BACKGROUND: There is recent evidence that the modified early warning scoring systems (MEWS) in the emergency department (ED) can identify patients at risk of deterioration. However, concerns remain that they are not sensitive enough to use as a risk assessment tool. OBJECTIVE: To assess use of MEWS in UK EDs. METHODS: A postal survey was undertaken of 254 adult EDs within the UK. Questionnaires were sent to the clinical lead at each department about their use of early warning scoring systems. RESULTS: Responses were received from 145 departments giving a response rate of 57%. 87% of respondents are currently using early warning scores (EWS). Of those, 80% are using MEWS. In 71% high EWS results in senior ED review, however in 25% it does not. Less than half of departments use high MEWS to trigger critical care input. 93% of respondents support using EWS in the ED. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of strong evidence, the majority of UK EDs are using EWS in some form. MEWS is the most commonly used but departments vary on their use of EWS for senior ED and/or critical care review. Over 90% of respondents in this survey support EWS in the ED.
Authors: Marie Ward; Eilish McAuliffe; Abel Wakai; Una Geary; John Browne; Conor Deasy; Michael Schull; Fiona Boland; Fiona McDaid; Eoin Coughlan; Ronan O'Sullivan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Matthew J Reed; Megan McGrath; Polly L Black; Steff Lewis; Christopher McCann; Stewart Whiting; Rachel O'Brien; Alison Grant; Beth Harrison; Laura Skyrme; Miranda Odam Journal: Diagn Progn Res Date: 2018-09-03
Authors: Theresa McElroy; Erik N Swartz; Kasra Hassani; Sina Waibel; Yasmin Tuff; Catherine Marshall; Richard Chan; David Wensley; Maureen O'Donnell Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2019-11-27
Authors: Marie E Ward; Abel Wakai; Ronald McDowell; Fiona Boland; Eoin Coughlan; Moayed Hamza; John Browne; Ronan O'Sullivan; Una Geary; Fiona McDaid; Éidín Ní Shé; Frances J Drummond; Conor Deasy; Eilish McAuliffe Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2019-01-14