Literature DB >> 21964859

Calculation of chromophore excited state energy shifts in response to molecular dynamics of pigment-protein complexes.

Serguei Vassiliev1, Abdullah Mahboob, Doug Bruce.   

Abstract

The absorption and energy transfer properties of photosynthetic pigments are strongly influenced by their local environment or "site." Local electrostatic fields vary in time with protein and chromophore molecular movement and thus transiently influence the excited state transition properties of individual chromophores. Site-specific information is experimentally inaccessible in many light-harvesting pigment-proteins due to multiple chromophores with overlapping spectra. Full quantum mechanical calculations of each chromophores excited state properties are too computationally demanding to efficiently calculate the changing excitation energies along a molecular dynamics trajectory in a pigment-protein complex. A simplified calculation of electrostatic interactions with each chromophores ground to excited state transition, the so-called charge density coupling (CDC) for site energy, CDC, has previously been developed to address this problem. We compared CDC to more rigorous quantum chemical calculations to determine its accuracy in computing excited state energy shifts and their fluctuations within a molecular dynamics simulation of the bacteriochlorophyll containing light-harvesting Fenna-Mathews-Olson (FMO) protein. In most cases CDC calculations differed from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations in predicting both excited state energy and its fluctuations. The discrepancies arose from the inability of CDC to account for the differing effects of charge on ground and excited state electron orbitals. Results of our study show that QM calculations are indispensible for site energy computations and the quantification of contributions from different parts of the system to the overall site energy shift. We suggest an extension of QM/MM methodology of site energy shift calculations capable of accounting for long-range electrostatic potential contributions from the whole system, including solvent and ions. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964859     DOI: 10.1007/s11120-011-9689-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  26 in total

1.  Three-dimensional structure of cyanobacterial photosystem I at 2.5 A resolution.

Authors:  P Jordan; P Fromme; H T Witt; O Klukas; W Saenger; N Krauss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein.

Authors:  Carlos Simmerling; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian E Roitberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  The quantitative relationship between structure and polarized spectroscopy in the FMO complex of Prosthecochloris aestuarii: refining experiments and simulations.

Authors:  Markus Wendling; Milosz A Przyjalgowski; Demet Gülen; Simone I E Vulto; Thijs J Aartsma; Rienk van Grondelle; Herbert van Amerongen
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Theoretical prediction of spectral and optical properties of bacteriochlorophylls in thermally disordered LH2 antenna complexes.

Authors:  Lorant Janosi; Ioan Kosztin; Ana Damjanović
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Calculation of pigment transition energies in the FMO protein: from simplicity to complexity and back.

Authors:  Julia Adolphs; Frank Müh; Mohamed El-Amine Madjet; Thomas Renger
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The structural basis for the difference in absorbance spectra for the FMO antenna protein from various green sulfur bacteria.

Authors:  Dale E Tronrud; Jianzhong Wen; Leslie Gay; Robert E Blankenship
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Low-energy chlorophyll states in the CP43 antenna protein complex: simulation of various optical spectra. II.

Authors:  Mike Reppert; Valter Zazubovich; Nhan C Dang; Michael Seibert; Ryszard Jankowiak
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Structure-based calculations of optical spectra of photosystem I suggest an asymmetric light-harvesting process.

Authors:  Julian Adolphs; Frank Müh; Mohamed El-Amine Madjet; Marcel Schmidt am Busch; Thomas Renger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Effect of chlorin structure on theoretical electronic absorption spectra and on the energy released by porphyrin-based photosensitizers.

Authors:  Marcela Palma; Gloria I Cárdenas-Jirón; M Isabel Menéndez Rodríguez
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Cyanobacterial photosystem II at 2.9-A resolution and the role of quinones, lipids, channels and chloride.

Authors:  Albert Guskov; Jan Kern; Azat Gabdulkhakov; Matthias Broser; Athina Zouni; Wolfram Saenger
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  3 in total

1.  Excited state dynamics in photosynthetic reaction center and light harvesting complex 1.

Authors:  Johan Strümpfer; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Molecular dynamics simulations in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Nicoletta Liguori; Roberta Croce; Siewert J Marrink; Sebastian Thallmair
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Photosystem II does not possess a simple excitation energy funnel: time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy meets theory.

Authors:  Yutaka Shibata; Shunsuke Nishi; Keisuke Kawakami; Jian-Ren Shen; Thomas Renger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.