PURPOSE:Misoprostol, a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E1, has anti-inflammatory and mucosa-protecting properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of misoprostol oral rinse in reducing the severity of oral mucosal injury caused by high-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: The study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Oncology patients receiving myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy, in preparation for a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, were randomized to misoprostol or placebo rinse. The primary outcome measure was the severity of oral mucositis, measured using the modified Oral Mucositis Index. Additional outcome measures included the severity of mouth pain (measured using a Visual Analog Scale and the Pain Affect Faces Scale), duration of hospital stay, and days on total parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: This study was originally planned to accrue 160 subjects but was terminated early due to revised sponsor research priorities. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 22 subjects randomized to misoprostol rinse and 26 subjects randomized to placebo rinse. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mucositis or pain severity. In both groups, duration of hospital stay was approximately 19 days, and number of days on total parenteral nutrition was 17-18 days. There were no serious adverse events attributable to misoprostol rinse. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not find a beneficial effect of a misoprostol rinse in mucositis secondary to high-dose chemotherapy, the small sample size limits the strength of this conclusion. Given the proposed importance of the prostaglandin pathway in the pathogenesis of oral mucositis, additional studies are warranted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Misoprostol, a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E1, has anti-inflammatory and mucosa-protecting properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of misoprostol oral rinse in reducing the severity of oral mucosal injury caused by high-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: The study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Oncology patients receiving myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy, in preparation for a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, were randomized to misoprostol or placebo rinse. The primary outcome measure was the severity of oral mucositis, measured using the modified Oral Mucositis Index. Additional outcome measures included the severity of mouth pain (measured using a Visual Analog Scale and the Pain Affect Faces Scale), duration of hospital stay, and days on total parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: This study was originally planned to accrue 160 subjects but was terminated early due to revised sponsor research priorities. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 22 subjects randomized to misoprostol rinse and 26 subjects randomized to placebo rinse. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mucositis or pain severity. In both groups, duration of hospital stay was approximately 19 days, and number of days on total parenteral nutrition was 17-18 days. There were no serious adverse events attributable to misoprostol rinse. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not find a beneficial effect of a misoprostol rinse in mucositis secondary to high-dose chemotherapy, the small sample size limits the strength of this conclusion. Given the proposed importance of the prostaglandin pathway in the pathogenesis of oral mucositis, additional studies are warranted.
Authors: S T Sonis; G Oster; H Fuchs; L Bellm; W Z Bradford; J Edelsberg; V Hayden; J Eilers; J B Epstein; F G LeVeque; C Miller; D E Peterson; M M Schubert; F K Spijkervet; M Horowitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Barasch; D E Peterson; J M Tanzer; J A D'Ambrosio; K Nuki; M M Schubert; J C Franquin; J Clive; P Tutschka Journal: Cancer Date: 1995-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L Vagliano; C Feraut; G Gobetto; A Trunfio; A Errico; V Campani; G Costazza; A Mega; V Matozzo; M Berni; F Alberani; M M Banfi; L Martinelli; S Munaron; L Orlando; L Lubiato; S Leanza; R Guerrato; A Rossetti; M Messina; L Barzetti; G Satta; V Dimonte Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2010-09-06 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: A P Rapoport; L F Miller Watelet; T Linder; S Eberly; R F Raubertas; J Lipp; R Duerst; C N Abboud; L Constine; J Andrews; M A Etter; L Spear; E Powley; C H Packman; J M Rowe; U Schwertschlag; C Bedrosian; J L Liesveld Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey A Jones; Elenir B C Avritscher; Catherine D Cooksley; Marisol Michelet; B Nebiyou Bekele; Linda S Elting Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: A Dueñas-Gonzalez; P Sobrevilla-Calvo; M Frias-Mendivil; D Gallardo-Rincon; F Lara-Medina; L Aguilar-Ponce; E Miranda-Lopez; J Zinser-Sierra; E Reynoso-Gomez Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Triantafyllia Sarri; Joanne Bowen; Mario Di Palma; Vassilios E Kouloulias; Pasquale Niscola; Dorothea Riesenbeck; Monique Stokman; Wim Tissing; Eric Yeoh; Sharon Elad; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marika Cinausero; Giuseppe Aprile; Paola Ermacora; Debora Basile; Maria G Vitale; Valentina Fanotto; Giuseppe Parisi; Lorenzo Calvetti; Stephen T Sonis Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 5.810