P Randelli1, P Arrigoni, F Cabitza, V Ragone, P Cabitza. 1. Dipartimento Di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, IRCCS, Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. pietro.randelli@unimi.it
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report orthopedic surgeons' management of choice for difficult clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies. METHODS: A web questionnaire was developed including four clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies. Subsequently, opinions were solicited from more than 1,000 members of an international association of surgeons specialized in sports traumatology and knee surgery (ESSKA). RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (412 questionnaires). For scenario 1, first anterior dislocation of the shoulder, the most indicated treatment for 71% of respondents was an arthroscopic Bankart repair (P < 0.001). For scenario 2, shoulder arthritis with concentric erosion and cuff tear, 38% chose a shoulder replacement, while 37% preferred a supraspinatus tendon repair in combination with long head of biceps (LHB) tenodesis or tenotomy. For scenario 3, large tendon tears with 70% fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus tendon and lateral LHB instability, 70% of surgeons considered that, among conservative treatments, hyaluronic acid injection was not an appropriate management. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic acromioplasty, and LHB tenotomy gained larger consensus (81, 80, and 79% of respondents, respectively). A double-row technique for rotator cuff repair was preferred to a single-row technique (P = 0.02). Scenario 4, adhesive capsulitis, split the respondents equally, with 51% in favor of a surgical approach and 49% in favor of a conservative approach (N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: On-line questionnaires have the potential to improve knowledge about current trends in clinical practice and can help orthopedic surgeons to develop guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional; Level V (expert opinion).
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report orthopedic surgeons' management of choice for difficult clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies. METHODS: A web questionnaire was developed including four clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies. Subsequently, opinions were solicited from more than 1,000 members of an international association of surgeons specialized in sports traumatology and knee surgery (ESSKA). RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (412 questionnaires). For scenario 1, first anterior dislocation of the shoulder, the most indicated treatment for 71% of respondents was an arthroscopic Bankart repair (P < 0.001). For scenario 2, shoulder arthritis with concentric erosion and cuff tear, 38% chose a shoulder replacement, while 37% preferred a supraspinatus tendon repair in combination with long head of biceps (LHB) tenodesis or tenotomy. For scenario 3, large tendon tears with 70% fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus tendon and lateral LHB instability, 70% of surgeons considered that, among conservative treatments, hyaluronic acid injection was not an appropriate management. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic acromioplasty, and LHB tenotomy gained larger consensus (81, 80, and 79% of respondents, respectively). A double-row technique for rotator cuff repair was preferred to a single-row technique (P = 0.02). Scenario 4, adhesive capsulitis, split the respondents equally, with 51% in favor of a surgical approach and 49% in favor of a conservative approach (N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: On-line questionnaires have the potential to improve knowledge about current trends in clinical practice and can help orthopedic surgeons to develop guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional; Level V (expert opinion).
Authors: C Michael Robinson; Paul J Jenkins; Timothy O White; Andrew Ker; Elizabeth Will Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Leo G Jacobs; Matthew Guy Smith; Sohail A Khan; Karen Smith; Miland Joshi Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Alberto Vascellari; Alberto Grassi; Alberto Combi; Luca Tomaello; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Richard E Hogan; Eoghan T Hurley; Conor J Kilkenny; Thomas K Moore; David N Rowe; Martin S Davey; Leo Pauzenberger; Hannan Mullett Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Keith T Corpus; Grant H Garcia; Joseph N Liu; David M Dines; Stephen J O'Brien; Joshua S Dines; Samuel A Taylor Journal: HSS J Date: 2017-10-13