Literature DB >> 21964362

Needle in a haystack: the yield of syphilis outreach screening at 5 US sites-2000 to 2007.

Felicia M T Lewis1, Julia A Schillinger, Melanie Taylor, Toye H Brewer, Susan Blank, Tom Mickey, Bruce W Furness, Greta L Anschuetz, Melinda E Salmon, Thomas A Peterman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for syphilis has been performed for decades, but it is unclear if the practice yields many cases at acceptable cost, and if so, at which venues. We attempted a retrospective study to determine the costs, yield, and feasibility of analyzing health department-funded syphilis outreach screening in 5 diverse US sites with significant disease burdens.
METHODS: Data (venue, costs, number of tests, reactive tests, new diagnoses) from 2000 to 2007 were collected for screening efforts funded by public health departments from Philadelphia; New York City; Washington, District of Columbia; Maricopa County, Arizona (Phoenix); and the state of Florida. Crude cost per new case was calculated.
RESULTS: Screening was conducted in multiple venues including jails, shelters, clubs, bars, and mobile vans. Over the study period, approximately 926 258 tests were performed and 4671 new syphilis cases were confirmed, of which 225 were primary and secondary, and 688 were early latent or high-titer late latent. Jail intake screening consistently identified the largest numbers of new cases (including 67.6% of early and high-titer late-latent cases) at a cost per case ranging from $144 to $3454. Data quality from other venues varied greatly between sites and was often poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Though the yield of jail intake screening was good, poor data quality, particularly cost data, precluded accurate cost/yield comparisons at other venues. Few cases of infectious syphilis were identified through outreach screening at any venue. Health departments should routinely collect all cost and testing data for screening efforts so that their yield can be evaluated.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964362      PMCID: PMC6785748          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182113954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  23 in total

1.  Screening for syphilis in arrestees: usefulness for community-wide syphilis surveillance and control.

Authors:  Richard H Kahn; Daniel T Scholl; Simon M Shane; Anne L Lemoine; Thomas A Farley
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Examining the direct costs and effectiveness of syphilis detection by selective screening and partner notification.

Authors:  S L Reynolds; A S Kapadia; L Leonard; M W Ross
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-12

3.  Identifying likely syphilis transmitters: implications for control and evaluation.

Authors:  Richard H Kahn; Thomas A Peterman; Janet Arno; Emmett John Coursey; Stuart M Berman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Rapid screening and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases in arrestees: a feasible control measure.

Authors:  J F Beltrami; D A Cohen; J T Hamrick; T A Farley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The association between congenital syphilis and cocaine/crack use in New York City: a case-control study.

Authors:  M S Greenberg; T Singh; M Htoo; S Schultz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Rising rates of syphilis in the era of syphilis elimination.

Authors:  Roxanne P Kerani; H Hunter Handsfield; Mark S Stenger; Taraneh Shafii; Ellen Zick; Devon Brewer; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Reaching out to boys at bars: utilizing community partnerships to employ a wellness strategy for syphilis control among men who have sex with men in New York City.

Authors:  Susan Blank; Kathleen Gallagher; Kate Washburn; Meighan Rogers
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 8.  Control of syphilis outbreaks in men who have sex with men: the role of screening in nonmedical settings.

Authors:  Carol Ciesielski; Richard H Kahn; Melanie Taylor; Kathleen Gallagher; Larry J Prescott; Susan Arrowsmith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Public health intervention in a cocaine-related syphilis outbreak.

Authors:  J R Hibbs; R A Gunn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Intensive screening for gonorrhea, syphilis, and hepatitis B in a gay bathhouse does not lower the prevalence infection.

Authors:  F C Wolf; F N Judson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1980 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incorporation of Social Determinants of Health in the Peer-Reviewed Literature: A Systematic Review of Articles Authored by the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention.

Authors:  Eleanor E Friedman; Hazel D Dean; Wayne A Duffus
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A case of congenital syphilis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Francisco A Perez; Marguerite T Parisi; Lorenzo Giacani
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-02-27

3.  Evaluation of the Lumipulse G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test.

Authors:  Daniel A Ortiz; Michael J Loeffelholz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Previously undiagnosed HIV infections identified through cluster investigation, North Carolina, 2002-2007.

Authors:  Natalie J M Dailey Garnes; Zack S Moore; Betsy L Cadwell; Aaron T Fleischauer; Peter Leone
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-04

Review 5.  Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Outside the Clinic--Implications for the Modern Sexually Transmitted Disease Program.

Authors:  Kyle T Bernstein; Joan M Chow; Preeti Pathela; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Emerging trends and persistent challenges in the management of adult syphilis.

Authors:  Susan Tuddenham; Khalil G Ghanem
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.