Literature DB >> 21963578

Effects of levosimendan on mortality and hospitalization. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Giovanni Landoni1, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Massimiliano Greco, Teresa Greco, Elena Bignami, Andrea Morelli, Fabio Guarracino, Alberto Zangrillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Catecholaminergic inotropes have a place in the management of low output syndrome and decompensated heart failure but their effect on mortality is debated. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer that enhances myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen use. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the impact of levosimendan on mortality and hospital stay. DATA SOURCES: BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials were searched for pertinent studies. International experts and the manufacturer were contacted. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were assessed by four trained investigators, with divergences resolved by consensus. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison of levosimendan vs. control. There were no restrictions on dose or time of levosimendan administration or on language. Exclusion criteria were: duplicate publications, nonadult studies, oral administration of levosimendan, and no data on main outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Study end points, main outcomes, study design, population, clinical setting, levosimendan dosage, and treatment duration were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data from 5,480 patients in 45 randomized clinical trials were analyzed. The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (507 of 2,915) among levosimendan-treated patients and 23.3% (598 of 2,565) in the control group (risk ratio 0.80 [0.72; 0.89], p for effect <.001, number needed to treat = 17 with 45 studies included). Reduction in mortality was confirmed in studies with placebo (risk ratio 0.82 [0.69; 0.97], p = .02) or dobutamine (risk ratio 0.68 [0.52-0.88]; p = .003) as comparator and in studies performed in cardiac surgery (risk ratio 0.52 [0.35; 0.76] p = .001) or cardiology (risk ratio 0.75 [0.63; 0.91], p = .003) settings. Length of hospital stay was reduced in the levosimendan group (weighted mean difference = -1.31 [-1.95; -0.31], p for effect = .007, with 17 studies included). A trend toward a higher percentage of patients experiencing hypotension was noted in levosimendan vs. control (risk ratio 1.39 [0.97-1.94], p = .053).
CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan might reduce mortality in cardiac surgery and cardiology settings of adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21963578     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232962a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  50 in total

1.  eComment. Levosimendan in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jamil Hajj-Chahine
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  De novo acute heart failure and acutely decompensated chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Astrid Hummel; Klausn Empe; Marcus Dörr; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Levosimendan in Advanced Heart Failure: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Antonio Abbate; Benjamin W Van Tassell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Effects of levosimendan for low cardiac output syndrome in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Geert Koster; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Jan G Zijlstra; Thomas W L Scheeren; Iwan C C van der Horst; Frederik Keus
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The efficacy and safety of prophylactic use of levosimendan on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wanyu Wang; Xiaoshuang Zhou; Xinyang Liao; Bin Liu; Hai Yu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Targeting the sarcomere to correct muscle function.

Authors:  Peter M Hwang; Brian D Sykes
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Prevention of organ dysfunction in septic shock: still looking for an effective treatment.

Authors:  Giovanni Landoni; Alessandro Belletti; Alessandro Putzu; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Role of PiCCO monitoring for the integrated management of neurogenic pulmonary edema following traumatic brain injury: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoping Lin; Zhijun Xu; Pengfei Wang; Yan Xu; Gensheng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Levosimendan is superior to dobutamine as an inodilator in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension for children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Abdelhay A Ebade; Mohamed A Khalil; Ahmed K Mohamed
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.