Literature DB >> 21963402

Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention.

Katalin Varga1, Zoltán Németh, Anna Szekely.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers (N=116) participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (WSGC). We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests. These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963402     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  9 in total

1.  Revisiting the association between hypnotisability and blink rate.

Authors:  Francesco Di Gruttola; Paolo Orsini; Maria C Carboncini; Bruno Rossi; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

3.  Attention or instruction: Do sustained attentional abilities really differ between high and low hypnotisable persons?

Authors:  Jean-Rémy Martin; Jérôme Sackur; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-07

4.  Linear and non linear measures of pupil size as a function of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Antonio Lanatà; Alberto Greco; Mirco Ciardelli; Allison Uvelli; Elisabetta Fratini; Diego Manzoni; Enzo P Scilingo; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Laura Sebastiani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Shared cognitive mechanisms of hypnotizability with executive functioning and information salience.

Authors:  Afik Faerman; David Spiegel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Strategies that reduce Stroop interference.

Authors:  B Palfi; B A Parris; A F Collins; Z Dienes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Hypnotizability and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphysms in Italians.

Authors:  Silvano Presciuttini; Alessandro Gialluisi; Serena Barbuti; Michele Curcio; Fabrizio Scatena; Giancarlo Carli; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  New views of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  The Prefrontal Cortex and Suggestion: Hypnosis vs. Placebo Effects.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.