R Chiu1, W Li, R P Herber, S J Marshall, M Young, S P Ho. 1. Division of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Matrix proteoglycans define matrix structure, mineralization, and resulting biomechanics of tissues and their attachment sites. OBJECTIVE: We therefore investigated physical and (bio)chemical differences in enamel and periodontal tissues/attachment sites from mice that lack a specific nanoscale small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRPs) named biglycan (BGN). DESIGN: Experimental groups consisted of N=4, biglycan knockout (BGNKO) and N=5 wildtype (WT) 8-week-old, male C3H mice. Morphology, histochemical and mechanical analyses were performed through micro X-ray computed tomography (Micro XCT™), immunohistochemistry, and microindentation. Unless mentioned otherwise, all differences between BGNKO and WT were demonstrated to be statistically significant through Student's t-tests with a 95% confidence interval (P≤0.05). RESULTS: Histomorphometry performed by using Micro XCT™ images indicated significantly higher BGNKO-enamel (0.46 ± 0.03mm(3)) and BGNKO-root (1.81 ± 0.10mm(3)) volumes compared to WT-enamel (0.37 ± 0.02mm(3)) and WT-root (1.65 ± 0.07mm(3)). BGNKO tooth size was relatively larger than WT mice, with no significant difference between skull sizes. Immunohistochemistry indicated BGN expression in the periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bone (AB), at the bone-PDL and cementum-PDL attachment sites in WT mice. Deeper AB resorption pits within interdental region of BGNKO specimens compared to WT resulting in significant differences in PDL-space of BGNKO (93 ± 13μm) and WT (74 ± 11μm) were observed. Microhardness of BGNKO-enamel (2.46 ± 0.60GPa) and BGNKO-AB (0.52 ± 0.10GPa) was significantly lower than WT-enamel (2.67 ± 0.60GPa) and WT-AB (0.54 ± 0.10GPa). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that BGNKO-mice exhibit significant differences in tissue properties compared to WT-mice.
UNLABELLED: Matrix proteoglycans define matrix structure, mineralization, and resulting biomechanics of tissues and their attachment sites. OBJECTIVE: We therefore investigated physical and (bio)chemical differences in enamel and periodontal tissues/attachment sites from mice that lack a specific nanoscale small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRPs) named biglycan (BGN). DESIGN: Experimental groups consisted of N=4, biglycan knockout (BGNKO) and N=5 wildtype (WT) 8-week-old, male C3H mice. Morphology, histochemical and mechanical analyses were performed through micro X-ray computed tomography (Micro XCT™), immunohistochemistry, and microindentation. Unless mentioned otherwise, all differences between BGNKO and WT were demonstrated to be statistically significant through Student's t-tests with a 95% confidence interval (P≤0.05). RESULTS: Histomorphometry performed by using Micro XCT™ images indicated significantly higher BGNKO-enamel (0.46 ± 0.03mm(3)) and BGNKO-root (1.81 ± 0.10mm(3)) volumes compared to WT-enamel (0.37 ± 0.02mm(3)) and WT-root (1.65 ± 0.07mm(3)). BGNKO tooth size was relatively larger than WT mice, with no significant difference between skull sizes. Immunohistochemistry indicated BGN expression in the periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bone (AB), at the bone-PDL and cementum-PDL attachment sites in WT mice. Deeper AB resorption pits within interdental region of BGNKO specimens compared to WT resulting in significant differences in PDL-space of BGNKO (93 ± 13μm) and WT (74 ± 11μm) were observed. Microhardness of BGNKO-enamel (2.46 ± 0.60GPa) and BGNKO-AB (0.52 ± 0.10GPa) was significantly lower than WT-enamel (2.67 ± 0.60GPa) and WT-AB (0.54 ± 0.10GPa). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that BGNKO-mice exhibit significant differences in tissue properties compared to WT-mice.
Authors: Jeremy D Lin; Andrew T Jang; Michael P Kurylo; Jonathan Hurng; Feifei Yang; Lynn Yang; Arvin Pal; Ling Chen; Sunita P Ho Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: L Wang; B L Foster; V Kram; F H Nociti; P M Zerfas; A B Tran; M F Young; M J Somerman Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Michael P Kurylo; Kathryn Grandfield; Grayson W Marshall; Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Sunita P Ho Journal: Arch Oral Biol Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 2.633
Authors: Sunita P Ho; Michael P Kurylo; Kathryn Grandfield; Jonathan Hurng; Ralf-Peter Herber; Mark I Ryder; Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Jian Q Feng; Samuel Webb; Grayson W Marshall; Donald Curtis; Joy C Andrews; Piero Pianetta Journal: Bone Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Elis J Lira Dos Santos; Amanda B de Almeida; Michael B Chavez; Cristiane R Salmon; Luciana S Mofatto; Mariana Barbosa Camara-Souza; Michelle H Tan; Tamara N Kolli; Fatma F Mohamed; Emily Y Chu; Pedro Duarte Novaes; Eduardo C A Santos; Kamila R Kantovitz; Brian L Foster; Francisco H Nociti Journal: Bone Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 4.626