Literature DB >> 21963320

Increased baseline temperature improves the acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials after spinal cord injury.

J L K Kramer1, J Haefeli, A Curt, J D Steeves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of increasing the skin surface baseline temperature for contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs).
METHODS: CHEPs were studied in healthy subjects and subjects with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) using a conventional 35°C (condition 1) or increased 42-45°C baseline temperature (condition 2). A third condition was used to standardize the contact heat stimulus duration from the different baseline temperatures. Changes in peak latency and N2P2 amplitude of the CHEPs and rating of perceived intensity were examined between conditions.
RESULTS: In healthy subjects, increasing the baseline temperature for contact heat stimulation significantly increased the rating of perceived intensity (conditions 2 and 3), as well as the amplitude of CHEPs (condition 2 only). Following SCI, an increased baseline temperature facilitated perception of contact heat stimulation and evoked potentials could be recorded from dermatomes that were insensitive to contact heat from a conventional baseline temperature.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing the acquisition of CHEPs can be achieved by increasing the baseline temperature. This effect can be attributed, in part, to shortening the stimulation duration. SIGNIFICANCE: After SCI, increasing the baseline temperature for CHEPs in dermatomes with absent or diminished sensation improved the neurophysiological resolution of afferent sparing.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963320     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  14 in total

Review 1.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Sex dimorphism in a mediatory role of the posterior midcingulate cortex in the association between anxiety and pain sensitivity.

Authors:  Lee-Bareket Kisler; Yelena Granovsky; Alon Sinai; Elliot Sprecher; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Irit Weissman-Fogel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Single-Trial Sparse Representation-Based Approach for VEP Extraction.

Authors:  Nannan Yu; Funian Hu; Dexuan Zou; Qisheng Ding; Hanbing Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Normative data for the segmental acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials in cervical dermatomes.

Authors:  Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Janosch Rinert; John L K Kramer; Armin Curt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A MISO-ARX-Based Method for Single-Trial Evoked Potential Extraction.

Authors:  Nannan Yu; Lingling Wu; Dexuan Zou; Ying Chen; Hanbing Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Neural and behavioral changes driven by observationally-induced hypoalgesia.

Authors:  Nandini Raghuraman; Yang Wang; Lieven A Schenk; Andrew J Furman; Christina Tricou; David A Seminowicz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Supraspinal nociceptive networks in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Vincent Huynh; Robin Lütolf; Jan Rosner; Roger Luechinger; Armin Curt; Spyridon Kollias; Michèle Hubli; Lars Michels
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?

Authors:  Lee-Bareket Kisler; Ilan Gurion; Yelena Granovsky; Alon Sinai; Elliot Sprecher; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Irit Weissman-Fogel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Normative data of contact heat evoked potentials from the lower extremities.

Authors:  J Rosner; P Hostettler; P S Scheuren; L Sirucek; J Rinert; A Curt; J L K Kramer; C R Jutzeler; M Hubli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.