Literature DB >> 21963266

Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2).

Audrey Chia1, Wei-Han Chua, Yin-Bun Cheung, Wan-Ling Wong, Anushia Lingham, Allan Fong, Donald Tan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our previous study, Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 1 (ATOM1), showed that atropine 1% eyedrops were effective in controlling myopic progression but with visual side effects resulting from cycloplegia and mydriasis. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and visual side effects of 3 lower doses of atropine: 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01%.
DESIGN: Single-center, double-masked, randomized study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 400 children aged 6-12 years with myopia of at least -2.0 diopters (D) and astigmatism of -1.50 D or less. INTERVENTION: Children were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% atropine to be administered once nightly to both eyes for 2 years. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length, accommodation amplitude, pupil diameter, and visual acuity were noted at baseline, 2 weeks, and then every 4 months for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myopia progression at 2 years. Changes were noted and differences between groups were compared using the Huber-White robust standard error to allow for data clustering of 2 eyes per person.
RESULTS: The mean myopia progression at 2 years was -0.30±0.60, -0.38±0.60, and -0.49±0.63 D in the atropine 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% groups, respectively (P=0.02 between the 0.01% and 0.5% groups; between other concentrations P > 0.05). In comparison, myopia progression in ATOM1 was -1.20±0.69 D in the placebo group and -0.28±0.92 D in the atropine 1% group. The mean increase in axial length was 0.27±0.25, 0.28±0.28, and 0.41±0.32 mm in the 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% groups, respectively (P < 0.01 between the 0.01% and 0.1% groups and between the 0.01% and 0.5% groups). However, differences in myopia progression (0.19 D) and axial length change (0.14 mm) between groups were small and clinically insignificant. Atropine 0.01% had a negligible effect on accommodation and pupil size, and no effect on near visual acuity. Allergic conjunctivitis and dermatitis were the most common adverse effect noted, with 16 cases in the 0.1% and 0.5% atropine groups, and no cases in the 0.01% group.
CONCLUSIONS: Atropine 0.01% has minimal side effects compared with atropine at 0.1% and 0.5%, and retains comparable efficacy in controlling myopia progression.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963266     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  139 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Scleral Mechanisms Underlying Ocular Growth and Myopia.

Authors:  Ravi Metlapally; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 3.  Practical applications to modify and control the development of ametropia.

Authors:  P R Sankaridurg; B A Holden
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia.

Authors:  Lothar Spillmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The myopia boom.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Full-field electroretinogram findings in children in the atropine treatment for myopia (ATOM2) study.

Authors:  Audrey Chia; Wen Li; Donald Tan; Chi D Luu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Myopia onset and progression: can it be prevented?

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Roberto Dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Current trends among pediatric ophthalmologists to decrease myopia progression-an international perspective.

Authors:  Ofira Zloto; Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; Sonal K Farzavandi; Rosario Gomez-de-Liaño; Derek T Sprunger; Eedy Mezer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  [Current recommendations for deceleration of myopia progression].

Authors:  W A Lagrèze; L Joachimsen; F Schaeffel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Opposing effects of atropine and timolol on the color and luminance emmetropization mechanisms in chicks.

Authors:  Laura A Goldberg; Frances J Rucker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.