Literature DB >> 21962788

Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 2: clinical order entry and imaging report data reconciliation.

Bruce I Reiner1.   

Abstract

Data reconciliation in medical imaging is designed to ensure the accuracy and integrity of data across multiple steps in the imaging cycle, ultimately leading to improved continuity of patient care. An integral component of this data reconciliation is tied to the steps of clinical order entry and radiology report creation. The clinical data presented at order entry by the referring clinician influence a number of important imaging decisions, including examination selection, protocol design, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of the imaging data set. The subsequent data derived from the radiology report have a profound impact on diagnosis, treatment, and overall clinical management. As a result, the reconciliation of clinical order entry and radiology report data affect health care delivery and in many respects are dependent on each other for optimal outcomes. The creation of a standardized reconciliation database that proactively records, tracks, analyzes, and provides feedback to radiologists and clinicians offers the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care, while providing objective accountability measures for individual and institutional health care providers.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21962788     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Demystifying occupational stress and fatigue through the creation of an adaptive end-user profiling system.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Application of innovation economics to medical imaging and information systems technologies.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Matthew McKinley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Strategies for medical data extraction and presentation part 2: creating a customizable context and user-specific patient reference database.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Using analysis of speech and linguistics to characterize uncertainty in radiology reporting.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  RIS-PACS, patient safety, and clinical risk management.

Authors:  Andrea Nitrosi; Marco Bertolini; Roberto Sghedoni; Pietro Notari; Pierpaolo Pattacini; Andrea Corazza; Mauro Iori
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Efficiency and effectiveness of an innovative RIS function for patient information reconciliation directly integrated with PACS.

Authors:  Andrea Nitrosi; Marco Bertolini; Pietro Notari; Andrea Botti; Vladimiro Ginocchi; Giulio Tondelli; Mauro Iori; Pierpaolo Pattacini
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Commentary: Quality assurance in ophthalmic imaging.

Authors:  Harshit Vaidya; Muna Bhende
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Performance indicators for radiation protection management: suggestions from the European Society of Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-12-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.