Literature DB >> 21962732

Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion.

Sujit Vijay Sakpal1, Supreet S Bindra, Ronald S Chamberlain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in appendicitis has gained increased popularity but remains controversial. Despite more than 20 y of experience in laparoscopy, the nationwide laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) conversion rate is reportedly 8.6%. We sought to analyze the impact of patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors that may contribute to open conversion during LA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 745 LAs (49.9% females and 50.1% males; average age of 37.8 y performed at a large tertiary community teaching hospital over a 5-y period (May 2004-October 2008) was performed.
RESULTS: The overall conversion rate for the study period was 4.16% (n = 31). The most common reason for open conversion was severe acute inflammation (38.7%). Among converted cases, 77.42% had no prior abdominal surgery and only 25.81% of cases were converted due to adhesions. Females and patients ≥ 65-y-old had a higher likelihood of open conversion (4.30% versus 4.02%, P < 0.99 and 9.26% versus 3.76%, P < 0.1107). The overall conversion rate of cases performed by high-volume surgeons (≥ 50 total cases) in comparison to low-volume surgeons (10-49 total cases) was higher (4.86% versus 3.30%, P < 0.39). Conversion rates were lower among surgeons who completed residency training after 1990 (3.72% versus 4.35%, P < 0.82) and those with fellowship training (1.42% versus 5.18%, P < 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic conversion continues to gain popularity and remains the gold standard procedure for appendectomy. Older patients have a higher likelihood of conversion with severe acute inflammation being the most common reason for conversion. Additional minimally invasive fellowship training was the only surgeon-specific factor that significantly impacted conversion rate.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21962732     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.

Authors:  X Jiang; H B Meng; D L Zhou; W X Ding; L S Lu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Impact of fellowship training on surgical outcomes after appendectomies: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jose L Cataneo; Eric Veilleux; Rami Lutfi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy.

Authors:  Fatih Çiftçi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 5.  Acute appendicitis: what is the gold standard of treatment?

Authors:  Cesare Ruffolo; Alain Fiorot; Giulia Pagura; Michele Antoniutti; Marco Massani; Ezio Caratozzolo; Luca Bonariol; Francesco Calia di Pinto; Nicolò Bassi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Authors' reply.

Authors:  Giuseppe Piccinni; Andrea Sciusco; Angela Gurrado; Germana Lissidini; Mario Testini
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Trends in splenectomy: where does laparoscopy stand?

Authors:  Gurdeep S Matharoo; John N Afthinos; Karen E Gibbs
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  TULAA: A Minimally Invasive Appendicectomy Technique for the Paediatric Patient.

Authors:  Giordano Perin; Maria Grazia Scarpa
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-12-18

9.  Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis: A Long-Term Cost Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Lindsay A Sceats; Seul Ku; Alanna Coughran; Britainy Barnes; Emily Grimm; Matthew Muffly; David A Spain; Cindy Kin; Douglas K Owens; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-08-17

Review 10.  Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.

Authors:  Thomas Zheng Jie Teng; Xuan Rong Thong; Kai Yuan Lau; Sunder Balasubramaniam; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.