Literature DB >> 21961867

Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity.

David J Moller1, Nicholas P Slimack, Frank L Acosta, Tyler R Koski, Richard G Fessler, John C Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Recently, the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach to the thoracolumbar spinal column has been described by various authors. This is known as the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the approach-related morbidity associated with the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. To date, there have been only a couple of reports regarding the morbidity of the transpsoas muscle approach.
METHODS: A nonrandomized, prospective study utilizing a self-reported patient questionnaire was conducted between January 2006 and June 2008 at Northwestern University. Data were collected in 53 patients with a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 3.5 years. Only 2 patients were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (19 of 53) of patients reported subjective hip flexor weakness, 25% (13 of 53) anterior thigh numbness, and 23% (12 of 53) anterior thigh pain. However, 84% of the 19 patients reported complete resolution of their subjective hip flexor weakness by 6 months, and most experienced improved strength by 8 weeks. Of those reporting anterior thigh numbness and pain, 69% and 75% improved to their baseline function by the 6-month follow-up evaluations, respectively. All patients with self-reported subjective hip flexor weakness underwent examinations during subsequent clinic visits after surgery; however, these examinations did not confirm a motor deficit less than Grade 5. Subset analysis showed that the L3-4 and L4-5 levels were most often affected.
CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive, transpsoas muscle approach to the lumbar spine has a number of advantages. The data show that a percentage of the patients undergoing the transpsoas approach will have temporary sensory and motor symptoms related to this approach. The majority of the symptoms are thought to be related to psoas muscle inflammation and/or stretch injury to the genitofemoral nerve due to the surgical corridor traversed during the operation. No major injuries to the lumbar plexus were encountered. It is important to educate patients prior to surgery of the possibility of these largely transient symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21961867     DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  29 in total

1.  The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer; Christoph Zandanell; Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Robert E Isaacs; Jim A Youssef; Kaveh Khajavi; Jeffrey R Balzer; Adam S Kanter; Fabrice A Küelling; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anatomic evaluation of retroperitoneal organs for lateral approach surgery: a prospective imaging study using computed tomography in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Jun Ouchida; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Hiroaki Nakashima; Naoki Segi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DW-MR) neurography of the lumbar plexus in the preoperative planning of lateral access lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Cristiano Magalhães Menezes; Luciene Mota de Andrade; Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero; Helton Luiz Defino; Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior; William Blake Rodgers; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anterior to psoas (ATP) fusion of the lumbar spine: evolution of a technique facilitated by changes in equipment.

Authors:  Cristian Gragnaniello; Kevin Seex
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

8.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer; Christoph Zandanell; Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1 in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sang-Hyun Lee; Eun-Min Seo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF).

Authors:  Roger Härtl; Alexander Joeris; Robert A McGuire
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.