Literature DB >> 21961470

Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.

Katrin Hegenscheid1, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Sebastian Fochler, Martin Domin, Stefan Weiss, Birgit Hartmann, Ulrich Bick, Norbert Hosten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Germany, a mammography-screening program (MSP) was implemented on a national level. It complies with all criteria of the European guidelines for quality assurance in screening mammography; however, the attendance rate is 54%, falling short of the target attendance rate of 70%. The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional telephone counseling improves attendance among nonresponders and the level of satisfaction with telephone counseling.
DESIGN: In a prospective RCT, women identified as nonresponders in the MSP were randomized to a control group that received written reminders or to an intervention group that additionally received telephone counseling. In a follow-up, a subset of the intervention group was contacted by telephone regarding their satisfaction with telephone counseling. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In 2008, a total of 5477 women aged 50-69 years who were eligible for the German MSP but had not participated up to 6 weeks after the first invitation were included in the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Individual telephone counseling consisted of scripted calls from a trained counselor who provided information on MSP and answered the woman's questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Report of mammography use provided by the screening unit 3 months after the reminder was sent.
RESULTS: Analysis was conducted in 2009. Comparison of screening attendance revealed a significantly higher attendance rate in the intervention group compared with controls (29.7% vs 26.1%, p=0.0035). When only women for whom telephone numbers were available were analyzed, attendance was even better (35.5% vs 29.7%, p=0.0004). In the follow-up, 278 of 404 women were actually surveyed. Of those, 33% stated that telephone counseling had influenced their decision, 56% stated that they had undergone screening mammography, and 77% agreed that personal telephone counseling should be used routinely to encourage nonresponders to go for screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual telephone counseling for nonresponders to a national program for breast cancer screening was well accepted by participants and effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000645954.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21961470     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veda Zabih; Alyssa Kahane; Natalya E O'Neill; Noah Ivers; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.

Authors:  Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Mary E Costanza; Christine F Frisard; Caroline Cranos; Susan Sama; Robert Yood
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Evaluating the impact of a novel behavioural science informed animation upon breast cancer screening uptake: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amish Acharya; Hutan Ashrafian; Deborah Cunningham; Josephine Ruwende; Ara Darzi; Gaby Judah
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  The Effect of Telephone Counseling and Education on Breast Cancer Screening in Family Caregivers of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Khadijeh Nasiriani; Monireh Motevasselian; Farahnaz Farnia; Seyed Mostafa Shiryazdi; Mahsa Khodayarian
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2017-10

5.  Effects of different reminder strategies on first-time mammography screening among women in Taiwan.

Authors:  Miao-Ling Lin; Joh-Jong Huang; Shu-Hua Li; Fang-Hsin Lee; Ming-Feng Hou; Hsiu-Hung Wang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Beauchamp; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Annie Cooper; Vicki Pridmore; Patricia Livingston; Matthew Scanlon; Melissa Davis; Jonathan O'Hara; Richard Osborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Telephone interventions in adherence to receiving the Pap test report: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ana Izabel Oliveira Nicolau; Thaís Marques Lima; Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos; Francisco Herlânio Costa Carvalho; Priscila de Souza Aquino; Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Jonathan P Myles; Roberta Maroni; Abeera Mohammad
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.

Authors:  Katja Kemp Jacobsen; My von Euler Chelpin; Ilse Vejborg; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.