Literature DB >> 21961181

The clinical impact and molecular biology of del(17p) in multiple myeloma treated with conventional or thalidomide-based therapy.

Kevin D Boyd1, Fiona M Ross, William J Tapper, Laura Chiecchio, GianPaolo Dagrada, Zoe J Konn, David Gonzalez, Brian A Walker, Sarah L Hockley, Christopher P Wardell, Walter M Gregory, J Anthony Child, Graham H Jackson, Faith E Davies, Gareth J Morgan.   

Abstract

Hemizygous deletion of 17p (del(17p)) has been identified as a variable associated with poor prognosis in myeloma, although its impact in the context of thalidomide therapy is not well described. The clinical outcome of 85 myeloma patients with del(17p) treated in a clinical trial incorporating both conventional and thalidomide-based induction therapies was examined. The clinical impact of deletion, low expression, and mutation of TP53 was also determined. Patients with del(17p) did not have inferior response rates compared to patients without del(17p), but, despite this, del(17p) was associated with impaired overall survival (OS) (median OS 26.6 vs. 48.5 months, P < 0.001). Within the del(17p) group, thalidomide induction therapy was associated with improved response rates compared to conventional therapy, but there was no impact on OS. Thalidomide maintenance was associated with impaired OS, although our analysis suggests that this effect may have been due to confounding variables. A minimally deleted region on 17p13.1 involving 17 genes was identified, of which only TP53 and SAT2 were underexpressed. TP53 was mutated in <1% in patients without del(17p) and in 27% of patients with del(17p). The higher TP53 mutation rate in samples with del(17p) suggests a role for TP53 in these clinical outcomes. In conclusion, del(17p) defined a patient group associated with short survival in myeloma, and although thalidomide induction therapy was associated with improved response rates, it did not impact OS, suggesting that alternative therapeutic strategies are required for this group.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21961181     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  33 in total

1.  p53-related protein kinase confers poor prognosis and represents a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Teru Hideshima; Francesca Cottini; Yoshihisa Nozawa; Hyuk-Soo Seo; Hiroto Ohguchi; Mehmet K Samur; Diana Cirstea; Naoya Mimura; Yoshikazu Iwasawa; Paul G Richardson; Nikhil C Munshi; Dharminder Chauhan; Walter Massefski; Teruhiro Utsugi; Sirano Dhe-Paganon; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; María-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Plasma cell enrichment enhances detection of high-risk cytogenomic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization and improves risk stratification of patients with plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Gary Lu; Ramya Muddasani; Robert Z Orlowski; Lynne V Abruzzo; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; M James You; Yaping Wang; Ming Zhao; Su Chen; Isabella Claudia Glitza; L Jeffrey Medeiros
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gareth J Morgan; Brian A Walker; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Mapping of chromosome 1p deletions in myeloma identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as being genes in regions associated with adverse survival.

Authors:  Kevin D Boyd; Fiona M Ross; Brian A Walker; Christopher P Wardell; William J Tapper; Laura Chiecchio; Gianpaolo Dagrada; Zoe J Konn; Walter M Gregory; Graham H Jackson; J Anthony Child; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.

Authors:  Simona Caltagirone; Marina Ruggeri; Simona Aschero; Milena Gilestro; Daniela Oddolo; Francesca Gay; Sara Bringhen; Caterina Musolino; Luca Baldini; Pellegrino Musto; Maria T Petrucci; Gianluca Gaidano; Roberto Passera; Benedetto Bruno; Antonio Palumbo; Mario Boccadoro; Paola Omedè
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  p53 haploinsufficiency and functional abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P J Teoh; T H Chung; S Sebastian; S N Choo; J Yan; S B Ng; R Fonseca; W J Chng
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Saad Usmani; David Siegel; Kenneth C Anderson; Wee-Joo Chng; Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Robert A Kyle; Jo Caers; Jens Hillengass; Jesús San Miguel; Niels W C J van de Donk; Hermann Einsele; Joan Bladé; Brian G M Durie; Hartmut Goldschmidt; María-Victoria Mateos; Antonio Palumbo; Robert Orlowski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Biologic frontiers in multiple myeloma: from biomarker identification to clinical practice.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A novel measure of chromosome instability can account for prognostic difference in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Chung; George Mulligan; Rafael Fonseca; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.