Literature DB >> 21959547

Learning curve of robotic-assisted microvascular anastomosis in the rat.

Joo-Yup Lee1, Tiago Mattar, Thomas J Parisi, Brian T Carlsen, Allen T Bishop, Alexander Y Shin.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that the learning plateau and learning rate of robotic-assisted microvascular anastomosis could be estimated statistically using curve-fitting method. Three surgeons with various microsurgical experiences performed 20 microsurgical anastomoses of the rat femoral artery using the da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). We evaluated the anastomosis time, patency rate, and quality of anastomosis. Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score which is introduced to assess surgical dexterity was also measured. The average starting anastomosis time was 101 ± 30 minutes, and the estimated mean learning plateau was 33 ± 15 minutes. The estimated mean learning rate for anastomosis time was 22 ± 5 trials and the estimated mean learning rate for OSATS score was 8 ± 1 trials. Overall patency rate was 90 ± 5%. Anastomosis patency correlated with OSATS score and quality of anastomosis rather than anastomosis time. Important aspects of learning curve can be estimated by fitting inverse curves for robotic-assisted microvascular anastomosis. As anastomosis time does not necessarily correlate with the patency rate, OSATS score might be a valuable tool to evaluate surgeons during training for this complicated surgical task. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959547     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1289166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  5 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice.

Authors:  Ahmet Gudeloglu; Jamin V Brahmbhatt; Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Robotic microsurgical training and evaluation.

Authors:  Jesse C Selber; Taiba Alrasheed
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Serik K Akshulakov; Roman A Polkin; Sergey V Ochkal; Ivan A Stepanov; Yerbol T Makhambetov; Talgat T Kerimbayev; Michael Staren; Evgenii Belykh; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-03-28

4.  A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Olivia Cundy; Harsh Samarendra; Khurram Khan; Iain Stuart Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-15

5.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.