Literature DB >> 21959451

Biomimetic matrices self-initiating the induction of bone formation.

Ugo Ripamonti1, Laura C Roden, Carlo Ferretti, Roland M Klar.   

Abstract

The new strategy of tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine at large, is to construct biomimetic matrices to mimic nature's hierarchical structural assemblages and mechanisms of simplicity and elegance that are conserved throughout genera and species. There is a direct spatial and temporal relationship of morphologic and molecular events that emphasize the biomimetism of the remodeling cycles of the osteonic corticocancellous bone versus the "geometric induction of bone formation," that is, the induction of bone by "smart" concavities assembled in biomimetic matrices of macroporous calcium phosphate-based constructs. The basic multicellular unit of the corticocancellous bone excavates a trench across the bone surface, leaving in its wake a hemiosteon rather than an osteon, that is, a trench with cross-sectional geometric cues of concavities after cyclic episodes of osteoclastogenesis, eventually leading to osteogenesis. The concavities per se are geometric regulators of growth-inducing angiogenesis and osteogenesis as in the remodeling processes of the corticocancellous bone. The concavities act as a powerful geometric attractant for myoblastic/myoendothelial and/or endothelial/pericytic stem cells, which differentiate into bone-forming cells. The lacunae, pits, and concavities cut by osteoclastogenesis within the biomimetic matrices are the driving morphogenetic cues that induce bone formation in a continuum of sequential phases of resorption/dissolution and formation. To induce the cascade of bone differentiation, the soluble osteogenic molecular signals of the transforming growth factor β supergene family must be reconstituted with an insoluble signal or substratum that triggers the bone differentiation cascade. By carving a series of repetitive concavities into solid and/or macroporous biomimetic matrices of highly crystalline hydroxyapatite or biphasic hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate, we were able to embed smart biologic functions within intelligent scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone. The concavities assembled in the bioceramic constructs biomimetize the remodeling cycle of the corticocancellous bone and are endowed with multifunctional pleiotropic self-assembly capacities, initiating angiogenesis and bone formation by induction without the exogenous applications of the osteogenic-soluble molecular signals of the transforming growth factor β supergene family. The incorporation of specific biologic activities into biomimetic matrices by manipulating the geometry of the substratum, defined as geometric induction of bone formation, is now helping to engineer therapeutic osteogenesis in clinical contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959451     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e83fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials for craniofacial bone engineering.

Authors:  R Tevlin; A McArdle; D Atashroo; G G Walmsley; K Senarath-Yapa; E R Zielins; K J Paik; M T Longaker; D C Wan
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds in craniofacial regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Viktor Tollemar; Zach J Collier; Maryam K Mohammed; Michael J Lee; Guillermo A Ameer; Russell R Reid
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2015-10-17

Review 3.  The material and biological characteristics of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  Zhurong Tang; Xiangfeng Li; Yanfei Tan; Hongsong Fan; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2017-09-08

4.  Three-dimensional printed PLA scaffold and human gingival stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a new tool for bone defect repair.

Authors:  Francesca Diomede; Agnese Gugliandolo; Paolo Cardelli; Ilaria Merciaro; Valeria Ettorre; Tonino Traini; Rossella Bedini; Domenico Scionti; Alessia Bramanti; Antonio Nanci; Sergio Caputi; Antonella Fontana; Emanuela Mazzon; Oriana Trubiani
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Immune Modulation by Transplanted Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials and Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Paul Humbert; Meadhbh Á Brennan; Noel Davison; Philippe Rosset; Valérie Trichet; Frédéric Blanchard; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Guiding bone formation using semi-onlay calcium phosphate implants in an ovine calvarial model.

Authors:  Gry Hulsart Billström; Viviana R Lopes; Christopher Illies; Sara Gallinetti; Jonas Åberg; Håkan Engqvist; Conrado Aparicio; Sune Larsson; Lars Kihlström Burenstam Linder; Ulrik Birgersson
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.323

7.  The effect of particle size on the osteointegration of injectable silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone substitute materials.

Authors:  Melanie J Coathup; Qian Cai; Charlie Campion; Thomas Buckland; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  In situ bone regeneration of large cranial defects using synthetic ceramic implants with a tailored composition and design.

Authors:  Omar Omar; Thomas Engstrand; Lars Kihlström Burenstam Linder; Jonas Åberg; Furqan A Shah; Anders Palmquist; Ulrik Birgersson; Ibrahim Elgali; Michael Pujari-Palmer; Håkan Engqvist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.