Literature DB >> 21959214

Screening and follow-up of living kidney donors: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

Allison Tong1, Jeremy R Chapman, Germaine Wong, Jeanine de Bruijn, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

To minimize the health risks faced by living kidney donors, multiple clinical practice guidelines have been developed on the assessment and care of potential donors. This study aims to compare the quality, scope, and consistency of these guidelines. We searched for guidelines on living kidney donation in electronic databases, guideline registries, and relevant Web sites to February 21, 2011. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education (AGREE) instrument. Textual synthesis was used to compare guideline recommendations. Ten guidelines, published from 1996 to 2010, were identified. Although generally comprehensive, scope varied considerably and mostly appeared to lack methodological rigor. Many recommendations were consistent, but important differences were evident, particularly for thresholds for comorbidities which precluded donation; obesity/overweight (body mass index, 30-35 kg/m), diabetes/prediabetes (fasting blood glucose level, 6.1-7.0 mmol/L and oral glucose tolerance test, 7.8-11.1 mmol/L), hypertension (130/85 to 140/90 mm Hg), cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and nephrolithiasis. The importance of informed voluntary consent, genuine motivation, support, and psychological health were recognized but difficult to implement as specific tools for conducting psychosocial assessments were not recommended. Multiple major guidelines for living kidney donation have been published recently, resulting in unnecessary duplicative efforts. Most do not meet standard processes for development, and important recommendations about thresholds for exclusion based on comorbidities are contradictory. There is an urgent need for international collaboration and coordination to ensure, where possible, that guidelines for living donation are consistent, evidence based, and comprehensive to promote best outcomes for a precious resource.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959214     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182328276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  26 in total

1.  Identifying Outcomes that Are Important to Living Kidney Donors: A Nominal Group Technique Study.

Authors:  Camilla S Hanson; Jeremy R Chapman; John S Gill; John Kanellis; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Steve J Chadban; Amit X Garg; Angelique F Ralph; Jule Pinter; Joshua R Lewis; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Cheryl L Jacobs
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Application of the 2017 KDIGO Guideline for the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Andrew S Levey; Bertram L Kasiske; Michael Cheung; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  The Lived Experience of "Being Evaluated" for Organ Donation: Focus Groups with Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Camilla S Hanson; Angelique F Ralph; Karine E Manera; John S Gill; John Kanellis; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Jeremy R Chapman; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Renal and cardiac assessment of living kidney donor candidates.

Authors:  Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Managing the Psychosocial and Financial Consequences of Living Donation.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Larissa Myaskovsky; Jennifer L Steel; Andrea F DiMartini
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

8.  Living Kidney Donors Who Develop Kidney Failure: Excerpts of Their Thoughts.

Authors:  Colin M E Halverson; Jackie Y Wang; Michael Poulson; Jennifer Karlin; Megan Crowley-Matoka; Lainie F Ross
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Kidney-Failure Risk Projection for the Living Kidney-Donor Candidate.

Authors:  Morgan E Grams; Yingying Sang; Andrew S Levey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Shoshana Ballew; Alex R Chang; Eric K H Chow; Bertram L Kasiske; Csaba P Kovesdy; Girish N Nadkarni; Varda Shalev; Dorry L Segev; Josef Coresh; Krista L Lentine; Amit X Garg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicability.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Melissa C Brouwers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.