Literature DB >> 21959121

The subjective visual vertical: validation of a simple test.

Luigi Tesio1, Stefano Longo, Viviana Rota.   

Abstract

The study sought to provide norms for a simple test of visual perception of verticality (subjective visual vertical). The study was designed as a cohort study with a balanced design. The setting was the Rehabilitation Department of a University Hospital. Twenty-two healthy adults, of 23-58 years, 11 men (three left handed) and 11 women (three left handed) were enrolled. A luminous bar was displayed on a PC screen, and rotated in steps of 0.4° until the participant perceived it as vertical. A positive sign was attributed to a clockwise rotation of the bar. The detection threshold was set at the angle corresponding to a perceived vertical, which the participant then selected out of three subsequent alternatives (each at +0.4 or -0.4°). The participant's position (sitting vs. standing) and the preset angle of presentation (clockwise vs. counterclockwise) were balanced across sex. The constant or deviation error (dE, in degrees) and the absolute errors (aE, in degrees) were computed. An analysis of variance model tested the dependence of dE on sex, posture, age, handedness, and the preset angle. Both dE and aE were unrelated to sex, posture, handedness, and the preset angle, but were dependent on age (junior, ≤43 years; senior, >43 years). The mean dE was -0.14 ± 0.60 in the junior and 0.42 ± 0.64 in the senior group, respectively. The minimal real difference of the dE was 0.75 and 0.25 in the junior and the senior group, respectively. The overall median aE was 0.4 (5th-95th percentile 0-1.2) in the junior and 0.8 (0.4-1.46) in the senior group, respectively. The whole test took no longer than 15 min in healthy participants, and 25 min in stroke patients. The test was applied to three subacute stroke patients with left hemiparesis, of whom two showed left spatial hemineglect. All three patients presented with a significant clockwise dE. This simple test appears to be valid for the routine assessment of spatial disorders in neurological impairments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959121     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32834c45bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

1.  Static Subjective Visual Vertical in Healthy Volunteers: The Effects of Different Preset Angle Deviations and Test-Retest Variability.

Authors:  J Venhovens; J Meulstee; W I M Verhagen
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2016-03-17

2.  Test-retest reliability of subjective visual vertical measurements with lateral head tilt in virtual reality goggles.

Authors:  Chia-Han Wang; Ariel A Winnick; Yu-Hung Ko; Zheyu Wang; Tzu-Pu Chang
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-01-19

3.  The Subjective Visual Vertical and the Subjective Haptic Vertical Access Different Gravity Estimates.

Authors:  Lindsey E Fraser; Bobbak Makooie; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visuo-postural dependency index (VPDI) in human postural control.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Maria M Ribeiro Dos Santos; Alessandra T Magalhães; Vinicius S Cardoso; Patricia Driusso; Luis Mochizuki; Adriana M Degani
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.