Literature DB >> 21959026

Evidence-based medicine: opportunities and challenges in a diverse society.

Rob Whitley1, Cecile Rousseau, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Laurence J Kirmayer.   

Abstract

In this article we explore the discourse and practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the context of social and cultural diversity. The article consists of 2 parts. First, we begin by defining EBM, describing its historical development and current ascendance in medical practice. We then note its importance in contemporary psychiatry, comparing dynamics between the United States and Canada. Secondly, we offer a constructive critique of the application of EBM and evidence-based practices in the context of ethnocultural diversity, as one consistent reflection on the EBM literature is that it is does not adequately address issues of diversity. In doing so, we use the situation here in Canada as an extended case study, though our observations will likely be applicable in other diverse nations, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. We critically examine the following 6 issues related to the practice of EBM in a diverse society: generalizability and transferability of evidence-based interventions; diversifying standards of evidence in EBM; strategies to address diversity in EBM research; cultural adaptations of evidence-based interventions; integrating idiographic knowledge; and, training and health service delivery. Concurrent with our critique, we offer research and practice suggestions that may address outstanding challenges vis-à-vis the practice of EBM in a diverse society. These include a need for more effectiveness research, more openness to diverse sources of knowledge, better integration of idiographic and nomothetic knowledge, and a critical approach to extrapolation and transfer of knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959026     DOI: 10.1177/070674371105600902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0706-7437            Impact factor:   4.356


  5 in total

1.  Research standardization tools: pregnancy measures in the PhenX Toolkit.

Authors:  Ann Kinga Malinowski; Cande V Ananth; Patrick Catalano; Erin P Hines; Russell S Kirby; Mark A Klebanoff; John J Mulvihill; Hyagriv Simhan; Carol M Hamilton; Tabitha P Hendershot; Michael J Phillips; Lisa A Kilpatrick; Deborah R Maiese; Erin M Ramos; Rosalind J Wright; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Five-year review of an international clinical research-training program.

Authors:  Claudia Kimie Suemoto; Sherine Ismail; Paulo César Rodrigues Pinto Corrêa; Faiza Khawaja; Teodoro Jerves; Laura Pesantez; Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani; Fabio Zaina; Augusto Cesar Soares Dos Santos; Ricardo Jorge de Oliveira Ferreira; Priyamvada Singh; Judy Vicente Paulo; Suely Reiko Matsubayashi; Liliane Pinto Vidor; Guilherme Andretta; Rita Tomás; Ben Mw Illigens; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Tamara Schloemer; Peter Schröder-Bäck
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Statement paper on diversity for the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  Bjoern Weiss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Recommendations for Measurement and Management of an Elite Athlete.

Authors:  William Sands; Marco Cardinale; Jeni McNeal; Steven Murray; Christopher Sole; Jacob Reed; Nikos Apostolopoulos; Michael Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.