Literature DB >> 21958953

Off-label use of misoprostol for labor induction: a nation-wide survey in Switzerland.

Elke Krause1, Simona Malorgio, Annette Kuhn, Corina Schmid, Marc Baumann, Daniel Surbek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Off-label use of drugs is frequent in obstetrical practice. No data however are available about nation-wide off-label use in obstetrics regarding frequency and patient information. The objective of our study was to assess the clinical practice of off-label use of misoprostol for labor induction. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a prospective nation-wide survey study by means of a validated questionnaire in three languages in Switzerland. All registered obstetricians/gynaecologists in Switzerland were included. Of 1100 subjects, 725 (66%) answered the questionnaire; 69 subjects were excluded because they were not actively practicing OB/GYN, resulting in a total of 656 questionnaires included in the analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 512 out of 656 obstetricians/gynaecologists (78%) use misoprostol for labor induction. The most frequent administration route of misoprostol is intravaginal (86%), in a single dose of 50μg (94%), at a dose interval range from 4 to 6h (85%). Among the users of misoprostol, 314 (61%) answered that they do not inform their patients about the off-label use of the medication. Among the non-users of misoprostol, the main reason for non-use is absent license for obstetric indications (48%) and non-availability (14%). If misoprostol were to be licensed for this indication, and commercially available, 69% of current non-users would use it. Non-users of misoprotol use prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel, ovules or slow-release vaginal insert, and oxytocin for labor induction.
CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is the single most commonly used drug for labor induction in Switzerland, although it is not licensed and although there are effective, licensed alternative drugs available. A minority of practitioners inform the patients about the off-label use.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958953     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Induction of Labor in Post-Term Nulliparous and Parous Women - Potential Advantages of Misoprostol over Dinoprostone.

Authors:  P Tsikouras; Z Koukouli; B Manav; M Soilemetzidis; A Liberis; R Csorba; G Trypsianis; G Galazios
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Misoprostol for Labour Induction after Previous Caesarean Section - Forever a "No Go"?

Authors:  W Rath; P Tsikouras
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Haas; Joanne Daggy; Kathleen M Flannery; Meredith L Dorr; Carrie Bonsack; Surya S Bhamidipalli; Rebecca C Pierson; Anthony Lathrop; Rachel Towns; Nicole Ngo; Annette Head; Sarah Morgan; Sara K Quinney
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  [Induction of labour at term with misoprostol: the experience of a Tunisian maternity ward].

Authors:  Nadia Ouerdiane; Nihel Tlili; Kaouther Othmani; Walid Daaloul; Abdelwaheb Masmoudi; Sonia Ben Hamouda; Badreddine Bouguerra
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-05-09

5.  Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term.

Authors:  Rachel Towns; Sara K Quinney; Rebecca C Pierson; David M Haas
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2017-07-25

6.  Off-label prescriptions in intensive care unit: the Chinese experience.

Authors:  Sai-Ping Jiang; Xing-Guo Zhang; Lin Liu; Hong-Yu Yang; Yan Lou; Jing Miao; Xiao-Yang Lu; Qing-Wei Zhao; Rong-Rong Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.

Authors:  Daniele Bolla; Saskia Vanessa Weissleder; Anda-Petronela Radan; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Luigi Raio; Martin Müller; Daniel Surbek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Health Related Quality of Life Post Labour Induction with Misoprostol Versus Dinoprostone At Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: A cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jonas Kagwisage; Belinda S Balandya; Andrea B Pembe; Phares Gm Mujinja
Journal:  East Afr Health Res J       Date:  2020-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.