Literature DB >> 21958911

Mobile phones, radiofrequency fields, and health effects in children--epidemiological studies.

Maria Feychting1.   

Abstract

In 2004, when WHO organized a workshop on children's sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, very few studies on radiofrequency fields were available. With the recent increase in mobile phone use among children and adolescents, WHO has identified studies on health effects in this age-group as a high priority research area. There are no empirical data supporting the notion that children and adolescents are more susceptible to RF exposure, but the number of studies is still relatively small. There are a few cross-sectional studies on well-being, cognitive effects and behavioral problems, and some cohort studies, mainly of maternal use of mobile phones during pregnancy. Cancer outcomes have been studied in relation to environmental RF exposure, e.g. from transmitters, and only one study on mobile phone use in children and adolescents and brain tumor risk has been published. Several methodological limitations need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the findings of the epidemiological studies. The cross-sectional design does not allow determination of the temporal sequence of exposure and outcome, and for several outcomes there is a large potential for reversed causality, i.e. that the outcome causes an increased RF exposure rather than the opposite. Biases such as recall errors in self-reported mobile phone use, lack of confounding control, e.g. of other aspects of mobile phone use than RF fields, trained behaviors, and pubertal development, makes causal interpretations impossible. Future studies need to include prospectively collected exposure information, incident outcomes, and proper confounding control. Monitoring of brain tumor incidence trends is strongly recommended.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958911     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  5 in total

Review 1.  Electromagnetic pollution: another risk factor for infertility, or a red herring?

Authors:  Alexander Lerchl
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Systematic review of the physiological and health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from wireless communication devices on children and adolescents in experimental and epidemiological human studies.

Authors:  Lambert Bodewein; Dagmar Dechent; David Graefrath; Thomas Kraus; Tobias Krause; Sarah Driessen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Acute Neuroinflammation Promotes Cell Responses to 1800 MHz GSM Electromagnetic Fields in the Rat Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Julie Lameth; Annie Gervais; Catherine Colin; Philippe Lévêque; Thérèse M Jay; Jean-Marc Edeline; Michel Mallat
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Terahertz electromagnetic fields (0.106 THz) do not induce manifest genomic damage in vitro.

Authors:  Henning Hintzsche; Christian Jastrow; Thomas Kleine-Ostmann; Uwe Kärst; Thorsten Schrader; Helga Stopper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Maternal cell phone use in early pregnancy and child's language, communication and motor skills at 3 and 5 years: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa).

Authors:  Eleni Papadopoulou; Margaretha Haugen; Synnve Schjølberg; Per Magnus; Gunnar Brunborg; Martine Vrijheid; Jan Alexander
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.