Literature DB >> 21958663

Prevalence of third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in young adults.

Rachel N Garaas1, Elda L Fisher, Graham H Wilson, Ceib Phillips, Daniel A Shugars, George H Blakey, Robert D Marciani, Raymond P White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on asymptomatic third molars in young adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study during a 5-year period. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was the measure of clinical periodontal status. The presence or absence of occlusal caries experience (carious lesions or restorations, including sealants) on third molars and on any surface of the first and second molars were assessed using a visual-tactile examination and panoramic radiographs. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none and caries experience versus no caries experience.
RESULTS: The data were analyzed from 409 subjects, who averaged 25 years old. More subjects were female (53%) and white (76%). More subjects had at least 1 periodontal probing depth of 4 mm or deeper on a third molar (55%) than on the distal of a second molar (46%). These findings were more likely to be detected around a third molar in subjects with all third molars at the occlusal plane (72%) than in subjects with at least one third molar below (33%). Overall, fewer subjects were affected by third molar caries experience than first or second molars (24% vs 73%, respectively). Of the subset of subjects with all four third molars at the occlusal plane, 26% were affected by both third molar periodontal pathology and caries experience and 16% were caries and periodontal pathology free.
CONCLUSIONS: In these cross-sectional analyses, periodontal pathology was detected more frequently on third molars than on first and second molars and caries experience was detected more frequently on first and second molars than on third molars. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958663     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology.

Authors:  M E Nunn; M D Fish; R I Garcia; E K Kaye; R Figueroa; A Gohel; M Ito; H J Lee; D E Williams; T Miyamoto
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Hossein Ghaeminia; Marloes El Nienhuijs; Verena Toedtling; John Perry; Marcia Tummers; Theo Jm Hoppenreijs; Wil Jm Van der Sanden; Theodorus G Mettes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-04

3.  Evaluation and management of asymptomatic third molars: Lack of symptoms does not equate to lack of pathology.

Authors:  Raymond P White; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Third Molar and Their Relationship with Caries on the Distal Surface of Second Molar: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  José Cristiano Ramos Glória; Carolina Castro Martins; Anna Catharina Vieira Armond; Endi Lanza Galvão; Cássio Roberto Rocha Dos Santos; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-07-13

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  J Toledano-Serrabona; V Ruiz-Romero; O Camps-Font; C Gay-Escoda; M-Á Sánchez-Garcés
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2021-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.