Jacob E D Levman1, Anne L Martel. 1. Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room S605, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada. jacob.levman@sri.utoronto.ca
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cancer screening by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be one of the most sensitive methods available for the early detection of breast cancer. There is high variability in the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists analyzing the large amounts of data acquired in a breast MRI examination, and this has motivated substantial research toward the development of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems. Most computer-aided diagnosis systems for breast MRI focus on dynamic information (how a lesion's brightness changes over the course of an examination after the injection of a contrast agent). The inclusion of lesion margin measurements is much less common. One characteristic of malignant tumors is that they grow into neighboring tissues. This growth creates tumor margins that are variably fuzzy or diffuse (ie, they are not sharp). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this short report, the authors present a new method for measuring a tumor's margin from breast MRI examinations and compare it with an existing mathematical technique for margin measurements. RESULTS: The proposed method can yield a test with sensitivity of 77% (specificity, 65%) on screening data, outperforming existing mathematical lesion margin measurement methods. Furthermore, when the presented margin measurement is combined with existing dynamic features, there is a statistically significant improvement in computer-aided diagnosis test performance (P < .0014). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method for measuring a tumor's margin outperforms existing mathematical methods on an extremely challenging data set containing many small lesions. The technique presented may be useful in discriminating between malignant and benign lesions in the context of the computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer from MRI. Copyright Â
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cancer screening by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be one of the most sensitive methods available for the early detection of breast cancer. There is high variability in the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists analyzing the large amounts of data acquired in a breast MRI examination, and this has motivated substantial research toward the development of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems. Most computer-aided diagnosis systems for breast MRI focus on dynamic information (how a lesion's brightness changes over the course of an examination after the injection of a contrast agent). The inclusion of lesion margin measurements is much less common. One characteristic of malignant tumors is that they grow into neighboring tissues. This growth creates tumor margins that are variably fuzzy or diffuse (ie, they are not sharp). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this short report, the authors present a new method for measuring a tumor's margin from breast MRI examinations and compare it with an existing mathematical technique for margin measurements. RESULTS: The proposed method can yield a test with sensitivity of 77% (specificity, 65%) on screening data, outperforming existing mathematical lesion margin measurement methods. Furthermore, when the presented margin measurement is combined with existing dynamic features, there is a statistically significant improvement in computer-aided diagnosis test performance (P < .0014). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method for measuring a tumor's margin outperforms existing mathematical methods on an extremely challenging data set containing many small lesions. The technique presented may be useful in discriminating between malignant and benign lesions in the context of the computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer from MRI. Copyright Â
Authors: José Raniery Ferreira; Marcelo Costa Oliveira; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: José Raniery Ferreira; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques; Marcelo Costa Oliveira Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: David Jones Ferreira de Lucena; José Raniery Ferreira Junior; Aydano Pamponet Machado; Marcelo Costa Oliveira Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 2.796