Literature DB >> 21958570

Endovascular management of acute aortic dissections.

Sean O'Donnell1, Ann Geotchues, Frederick Beavers, Cameron Akbari, Robert Lowery, Sherif Elmassry, John Ricotta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is one of the most common aortic emergencies that vascular specialists are asked to manage. Traditional surgical interventions for cases complicated by malperfusion have resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. With increasing availability of thoracic endografts, endovascular interventions for complicated AAD have become more acceptable. We reviewed our experience with endovascular treatment of AAD since January 2005.
METHODS: Medical records of patients admitted for AAD from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2008, were entered into our vascular registry and analyzed for risk factors, extent of dissection, type of management, fate of the false lumen, complications, and survival. There were 249 admissions for aortic dissections during the study period. Our study group included 28 patients with complicated AAD who underwent endovascular intervention.
RESULTS: During the study interval, 28 patients (16 male) underwent 44 procedures. The average age was 54 years. Risk factors differed from the typical atherosclerotic patient and were dominated by an 89.3% incidence of hypertension. Five patients (17.9%) presented with a history of recent cocaine use. The average length of stay was 25.1 days (range, 1-196 days). Stanford type B dissections were present in all but one patient. Twenty-six thoracic endografts were placed in 25 patients. Eight patients required multiple procedures in addition to a thoracic endograft. Morbidity occurred in 17 (60.7%) patients, with renal insufficiency occurring in 11 patients (39.3%) and one requiring permanent dialysis. Four neurologic events occurred: three strokes (10.7%) and one patient (3.6%) with temporary paraplegia. Three patients (10.7%) died in the periprocedural period, with ruptured dissection in one and pericardial tamponade in another. Eight of 10 computed tomography scans (80%) available for review in follow-up showed complete thrombosis of the thoracic false lumen.
CONCLUSIONS: Complicated AAD remains a challenging problem, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. However, our early experience with endovascular management offers a favorable reduction in mortality from historic controls.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958570     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Hitoshi Matsuda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-05

2.  Acute type a aortic dissection: for further improvement of outcomes.

Authors:  Kazumasa Orihashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Moulakakis; Spyridon N Mylonas; Ilias Dalainas; John Kakisis; Thomas Kotsis; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

4.  Adjunctive branch interventions during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute complicated type B dissection are not associated with inferior outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew C Chia; Rhami Khorfan; Mark K Eskandari
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.860

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.