BACKGROUND: Posthospitalization care is important for recovery after trauma. Disadvantaged populations, like racial or ethnic minorities and the uninsured, make up substantial percentages of trauma patients, but their use of posthospitalization facilities is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed National Trauma Data Bank admissions from 2007 for 18- to 64-year-olds and estimated relative risk ratios (RRR) of discharge to posthospitalization facilities--home, home health, rehabilitation, or nursing facility--by race, ethnicity, and insurance. Multinomial logistic regression adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and length of stay, among others. RESULTS: There were 136,239 patients who met inclusion criteria with data for analysis. Most patients were discharged home (78.9%); fewer went to home health (3.3%), rehabilitation (5.0%), and nursing facilities (5.4%). When compared with white patients in adjusted analysis, relative risk ratios of discharge to rehabilitation were 0.61 (95% CI 0.56, 0.66) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.40, 0.49) for blacks and Hispanics, respectively. Compared with privately insured white patients, Hispanics had lower rates of discharge to rehabilitation whether privately insured (RRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.40, 0.52), publicly insured (RRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42, 0.61), or uninsured (RRR 0.20, 95% CI 0.17, 0.24). Black patients had similarly low rates: private (RRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56, 0.71), public (RRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63, 0.82), or uninsured (RRR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23, 0.32). Relative risk ratios of discharge to home health or nursing facilities showed similar trends among blacks and Hispanics regardless of insurance, except for black patients with insurance whose discharge to nursing facilities was similar to their white counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Disadvantaged populations have more limited use of posthospitalization care such as rehabilitation after trauma, suggesting a potential improvement in trauma care for the underprivileged.
BACKGROUND: Posthospitalization care is important for recovery after trauma. Disadvantaged populations, like racial or ethnic minorities and the uninsured, make up substantial percentages of traumapatients, but their use of posthospitalization facilities is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed National Trauma Data Bank admissions from 2007 for 18- to 64-year-olds and estimated relative risk ratios (RRR) of discharge to posthospitalization facilities--home, home health, rehabilitation, or nursing facility--by race, ethnicity, and insurance. Multinomial logistic regression adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and length of stay, among others. RESULTS: There were 136,239 patients who met inclusion criteria with data for analysis. Most patients were discharged home (78.9%); fewer went to home health (3.3%), rehabilitation (5.0%), and nursing facilities (5.4%). When compared with white patients in adjusted analysis, relative risk ratios of discharge to rehabilitation were 0.61 (95% CI 0.56, 0.66) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.40, 0.49) for blacks and Hispanics, respectively. Compared with privately insured white patients, Hispanics had lower rates of discharge to rehabilitation whether privately insured (RRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.40, 0.52), publicly insured (RRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42, 0.61), or uninsured (RRR 0.20, 95% CI 0.17, 0.24). Black patients had similarly low rates: private (RRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56, 0.71), public (RRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63, 0.82), or uninsured (RRR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23, 0.32). Relative risk ratios of discharge to home health or nursing facilities showed similar trends among blacks and Hispanics regardless of insurance, except for black patients with insurance whose discharge to nursing facilities was similar to their white counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Disadvantaged populations have more limited use of posthospitalization care such as rehabilitation after trauma, suggesting a potential improvement in trauma care for the underprivileged.
Authors: Joseph R Betancourt; Alexander R Green; J Emilio Carrillo; Owusu Ananeh-Firempong Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: A M Kramer; J F Steiner; R E Schlenker; T B Eilertsen; C A Hrincevich; D A Tropea; L A Ahmad; D G Eckhoff Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ellen F Binder; Marybeth Brown; David R Sinacore; Karen Steger-May; Kevin E Yarasheski; Kenneth B Schechtman Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lisa M Knowlton; Alex H S Harris; Lakshika Tennakoon; Mary T Hawn; David A Spain; Kristan L Staudenmayer Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: John W Scott; Benjamin D Sommers; Thomas C Tsai; Kirstin W Scott; Aaron L Schwartz; Zirui Song Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Nathaniel H Greene; Mary A Kernic; Monica S Vavilala; Frederick P Rivara Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2018 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Molly M Fuentes; Megan Moore; Qian Qiu; Alex Quistberg; Matthew Frank; Monica S Vavilala Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2018-10-01
Authors: Megan Moore; Nathalia Jimenez; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Margaret Willis; Kate Baron; Jessica Giordano; Deborah Crawley; Frederick P Rivara; Kenneth M Jaffe; Beth E Ebel Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Adil H Haider; Jean-Stephane David; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud; David T Efron; Bernard Floccard; Ellen J MacKenzie; Eric Voiglio Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 12.969