Literature DB >> 21958380

Ten-year follow-up of early intensive self-management guidance in newly diagnosed patients with asthma.

Ritva Sirkka Kauppinen1, Vesa Vilkka, Jouni Hedman, Harri Sintonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the 10-year effectiveness of self-management guidance in a prospective follow-up study of patients with asthma when inhaled corticosteroids were used from the beginning in the treatment.
METHODS: Consecutive newly diagnosed asthmatics (n = 162) were randomized: 80 to an intervention group (IG) and 82 to a control group (CG). Lung function (LF), airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were examined at 10 years.
RESULTS: The advantages of intensive education with regards to LF measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were seen only after the first year. Later, there were no statistically significant differences in any parameters between the groups. However, during 10-year follow-up, peak expiratory flow, AHR, and HRQoL improved significantly in both groups (no differences as regards gender, smoking, or atopy). At 10 years, 68% of the IG and 75% of the CG patients still showed AHR after histamine challenge. Generic HRQoL scores in both groups equaled that of the age-standardized group a general population but only 50% in the IG and 55% in the CG had normal disease-specific HRQoL scores. According to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria 23% of patients in the IG and 25% in the CG had asthma under control.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of intensive self-management education could be shown only in the short term. The groups did not differ significantly in any of the parameters investigated, and showed nearly normal LF and HRQoL. AHR improved only partly and only a minority of the patients had asthma under good control according to GINA criteria. This study showed that evaluation of asthma using LF alone does not show the whole truth about asthma treatment results. HRQoL should be used in conjunction with GINA criteria, to assess asthma treatment outcomes. The value and importance of AHR for the evaluation of treatment remains obscure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958380     DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2011.616254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  4 in total

1.  Effect of depressive symptoms on asthma intervention in urban teens.

Authors:  Lokesh Guglani; Suzanne L Havstad; Christine Cole Johnson; Dennis R Ownby; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 6.347

2.  Evaluation of a web-based asthma self-management system: a randomised controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  John M Wiecha; William G Adams; Denis Rybin; Maria Rizzodepaoli; Jeremy Keller; Jayanti M Clay
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  [A randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention developed for adult asthmatics in a primary care centre].

Authors:  Gloria Cano Fuentes; Carmen Dastis Bendala; Isabel Morales Barroso; M Luisa Manzanares Torné; Andrés Fernández Gregorio; Leticia Martín Romana
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  The efficacy of a mobile phone application to improve adherence to treatment and self-management in people with chronic respiratory disease in Romanian population - a pilot study.

Authors:  Laura Adela Munteanu; Mirela Frandes; Bogdan Timar; Emanuela Tudorache; Ariadna Petronela Fildan; Cristian Oancea; Doina Ecaterina Tofolean
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.