PURPOSE: To assess some fall-related clinical variables (balance, gait, fear of falling, functional autonomy, self-actualization and self-efficacy) that might explain the fact that supervised Tai Chi has a better impact on preventing falls compared to a conventional physiotherapy program. METHODS: The participants (152 older adults over 65 who were admitted to a geriatric day hospital program) were randomly assigned to either a supervised Tai Chi group or the usual physiotherapy. The presence of the clinical variables related to falls was evaluated before the intervention (T1), immediately after (T2), and 12 months after the end of the intervention (T3). RESULTS: Both exercise programs significantly improved fall-related outcomes but only the Tai Chi intervention group decreased the incidence of falls. For both groups, most variables followed the same pattern, i.e. showed significant improvement with the intervention between T1 and T2, and followed by a statistically significant decrease at the T3 evaluation. However, self-efficacy was the only variable that improved solely with the Tai Chi intervention (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of supervised Tai Chi on fall prevention can not be explained by a differential effect on balance, gait and fear of falling. It appeared to be related to an increase of general self-efficacy, a phenomenon which is not seen in the conventional physiotherapy program.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess some fall-related clinical variables (balance, gait, fear of falling, functional autonomy, self-actualization and self-efficacy) that might explain the fact that supervised Tai Chi has a better impact on preventing falls compared to a conventional physiotherapy program. METHODS: The participants (152 older adults over 65 who were admitted to a geriatric day hospital program) were randomly assigned to either a supervised Tai Chi group or the usual physiotherapy. The presence of the clinical variables related to falls was evaluated before the intervention (T1), immediately after (T2), and 12 months after the end of the intervention (T3). RESULTS: Both exercise programs significantly improved fall-related outcomes but only the Tai Chi intervention group decreased the incidence of falls. For both groups, most variables followed the same pattern, i.e. showed significant improvement with the intervention between T1 and T2, and followed by a statistically significant decrease at the T3 evaluation. However, self-efficacy was the only variable that improved solely with the Tai Chi intervention (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of supervised Tai Chi on fall prevention can not be explained by a differential effect on balance, gait and fear of falling. It appeared to be related to an increase of general self-efficacy, a phenomenon which is not seen in the conventional physiotherapy program.
Authors: Betty Chewning; Kristine M Hallisy; Jane E Mahoney; Dale Wilson; Nisaratana Sangasubana; Ronald Gangnon Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2020-05-15
Authors: Denise Kendrick; Arun Kumar; Hannah Carpenter; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Dawn A Skelton; Juliette R Cook; Zoe Stevens; Carolyn M Belcher; Deborah Haworth; Sheena J Gawler; Heather Gage; Tahir Masud; Ann Bowling; Mirilee Pearl; Richard W Morris; Steve Iliffe; Kim Delbaere Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-11-28
Authors: Daniela L Stan; Nerissa M Collins; Molly M Olsen; Ivana Croghan; Sandhya Pruthi Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Catherine Sherrington; Simon Gates; Lindy M Clemson; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-09-12