Literature DB >> 21957916

A review of factors that influence adult handwriting performance.

Nadege van Drempt1, Annie McCluskey, Natasha A Lannin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Handwriting is an important activity for people of all ages. Handwriting is frequently affected after stroke and other neurological conditions. However, research on the handwriting of healthy adults is difficult to find. This review aims to advance the development of evidence-informed handwriting assessment and retraining. AIM: The aim of this paper was to review factors that influence the handwriting performance of unimpaired adults, some of which are amenable to intervention.
METHODS: Searches were conducted of eight electronic databases up to April 2009 and again in November 2010. Reference lists were also used to identify potential studies of interest. No limits were placed on study design.
FINDINGS: Age: Younger adults write more legibly and faster than older adults. Gender: Women write faster and more legibly than men. Pengrip: Grips other than the traditional dynamic tripod are functional, producing legible text in an acceptable time. Pen pressure: Pressure varies with different letters, words, text size, speed and across a page of text. Error corrections and a mixed writing style occur in healthy adult handwriting. Research was inconclusive about the association between speed, pressure and upper limb movements on handwriting performance. Other factors able to predict adult handwriting legibility have been largely unexplored. DISCUSSION: A number of knowledge and research gaps about adult handwriting were identified, including the need for more contemporary normative data.
© 2011 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal © 2011 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21957916     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00960.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  7 in total

1.  Variability of grip kinetics during adult signature writing.

Authors:  Bassma Ghali; Nayanashri Thalanki Anantha; Jennifer Chan; Tom Chau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Modeling the lexical morphology of Western handwritten signatures.

Authors:  Moises Diaz-Cabrera; Miguel A Ferrer; Aythami Morales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of Handwriting Movement Kinematics: From an Ecological to a Magnetic Resonance Environment.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Ludovico Pedullà; Laura Bonzano; Piero Ruggeri; Giampaolo Brichetto; Marco Bove
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Writing in a Digital World: Self-Correction While Typing in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Yoram M Kalman; Gitit Kavé; Daniil Umanski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Validity and reliability of a new tool to evaluate handwriting difficulties in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Evelien Nackaerts; Elke Heremans; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Sanne Broeder; Wim Vandenberghe; Bruno Bergmans; Alice Nieuwboer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Aging in biometrics: an experimental analysis on on-line signature.

Authors:  Javier Galbally; Marcos Martinez-Diaz; Julian Fierrez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spontaneous Emergence of Legibility in Writing Systems: The Case of Orientation Anisotropy.

Authors:  Olivier Morin
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.