Literature DB >> 21957225

Plasticity of rat motoneuron rhythmic firing properties with varying levels of afferent and descending inputs.

C W MacDonell1, D C Button, E Beaumont, B Cormery, P F Gardiner.   

Abstract

Hindlimb motoneuron excitability was compared among exercise-trained (E), sedentary (S), and spinal cord transected (T) Sprague-Dawley rats by examining the slope of the frequency-current (F/I) relationship with standard intracellular recording techniques in rats anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine. The T group included spinal transected and spinal isolated rats; the E animals were either spontaneously active (exercise wheel) or treadmill trained; and rats in the S group were housed in pairs. An analysis of motoneuron initial [1st interspike interval (ISI)], early (mean of 1st three ISIs), and steady-state (mean of last 3 ISIs) discharge rate slopes resulting from increasing and decreasing 500-ms injected square-wave depolarizing current pulses was used to describe rhythmic motoneuron properties. The steepest slope occurred in the S group (55.3 ± 22.2 Hz/nA), followed by the T group (35.5 ± 15.3 Hz/nA), while the flattest slope was found in the E group (25.4 ± 10.9 Hz/nA). The steepest steady-state slope occurred in the S group but was found to be similar between the T and E groups. Furthermore, a spike-frequency adaptation (SFA) index revealed a slower adaptation in motoneurons of the E animals only (∼40% lower). Finally, evidence for a secondary range of firing existed more frequently in the T group (41%) compared with the S (12%) and E (31%) groups. The lower F/I slope and lower SFA index of motoneurons for E rats may be a result of an increase in Na(+) conductance at the initial segment. The results show that motoneuronal rhythmic firing behavior is plastic, depending on the volume of daily activation and on intact descending pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21957225     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00122.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

Review 1.  Retracing your footsteps: developmental insights to spinal network plasticity following injury.

Authors:  C Jean-Xavier; S A Sharples; K A Mayr; A P Lognon; P J Whelan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  α-Motoneurons maintain biophysical heterogeneity in obesity and diabetes in Zucker rats.

Authors:  Christopher W MacDonell; Jeremy W Chopek; Kalan R Gardiner; Phillip F Gardiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Extensor motoneurone properties are altered immediately before and during fictive locomotion in the adult decerebrate rat.

Authors:  C W MacDonell; K E Power; J W Chopek; K R Gardiner; P F Gardiner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Endurance-exercise training adaptations in spinal motoneurones: potential functional relevance to locomotor output and assessment in humans.

Authors:  Kevin E Power; Evan J Lockyer; Alberto Botter; Taian Vieira; Duane C Button
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Brandon W Collins; Laura H Gale; Natasha C M Buckle; Duane C Button
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Rapid activity-dependent modulation of the intrinsic excitability through up-regulation of KCNQ/Kv7 channel function in neonatal spinal motoneurons.

Authors:  Joseph Lombardo; Jianli Sun; Melissa A Harrington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Health Benefits of Endurance Training: Implications of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Włodzimierz Mrówczyński
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Differences in supraspinal and spinal excitability during various force outputs of the biceps brachii in chronic- and non-resistance trained individuals.

Authors:  Gregory E P Pearcey; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.