Literature DB >> 21957161

Social technology restriction alters state-anxiety but not autonomic activity in humans.

John J Durocher1, Kelly M Lufkin, Michelle E King, Jason R Carter.   

Abstract

Social technology is extensively used by young adults throughout the world, and it has been suggested that interrupting access to this technology induces anxiety. However, the influence of social technology restriction on anxiety and autonomic activity in young adults has not been formally examined. Therefore, we hypothesized that restriction of social technology would increase state-anxiety and alter neural cardiovascular regulation of arterial blood pressure. Twenty-one college students (age 18-23 yr) were examined during two consecutive weeks in which social technology use was normal or restricted (randomized crossover design). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured at rest and during several classic autonomic stressors, including isometric handgrip, postexercise muscle ischemia, cold pressor test, and mental stress. Tertile analysis revealed that restriction of social technology was associated with increases (12 ± 2 au; range 5 to 21; n = 7), decreases (-6 ± 2 au; range -2 to -11; n = 6), or no change (0 ± 0 au; range -1 to 3; n = 8) in state-anxiety. Social technology restriction did not alter MAP (74 ± 1 vs. 73 ± 1 mmHg), heart rate (62 ± 2 vs. 61 ± 2 beats/min), or MSNA (9 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 1 bursts/min) at rest, and it did not alter neural or cardiovascular responses to acute stressors. In conclusion, social technology restriction appears to have an interindividual influence on anxiety, but not autonomic activity. It remains unclear how repeated bouts, or chronic restriction of social technology, influence long-term psychological and cardiovascular health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21957161      PMCID: PMC3233851          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00418.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states.

Authors:  Frank A Treiber; Thomas Kamarck; Neil Schneiderman; David Sheffield; Gaston Kapuku; Teletia Taylor
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Sympathetic activity is influenced by task difficulty and stress perception during mental challenge in humans.

Authors:  R Callister; N O Suwarno; D R Seals
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Neurovascular responses to mental stress in prehypertensive humans.

Authors:  Christopher E Schwartz; John J Durocher; Jason R Carter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-11-04

4.  Sympathetic and cardiac baroreflex function in panic disorder.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Lambert; Jane Thompson; Markus Schlaich; Dominique Laude; Jean-Luc Elghozi; Murray D Esler; Gavin W Lambert
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Augmented sympathetic nerve activity in response to stressors in young borderline hypertensive men.

Authors:  T Matsukawa; E Gotoh; S Uneda; E Miyajima; H Shionoiri; O Tochikubo; M Ishii
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1991-02

6.  Autonomic recovery and habituation in social anxiety.

Authors:  Iris B Mauss; Frank H Wilhelm; James J Gross
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Cold pressor test as a predictor of hypertension.

Authors:  D L Wood; S G Sheps; L R Elveback; A Schirger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Increased activation of sympathetic nervous system and endothelin by mental stress in normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents.

Authors:  G Noll; R R Wenzel; M Schneider; V Oesch; C Binggeli; S Shaw; P Weidmann; T F Lüscher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.

Authors:  Annika Rosengren; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Karen Sliwa; Mohammad Zubaid; Wael A Almahmeed; Kathleen Ngu Blackett; Chitr Sitthi-amorn; Hiroshi Sato; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Blood pressure reactivity to psychological stress predicts hypertension in the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Karen A Matthews; Charles R Katholi; Heather McCreath; Mary A Whooley; David R Williams; Sha Zhu; Jerry H Markovitz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sympathoneural and adrenomedullary responses to mental stress.

Authors:  Jason R Carter; David S Goldstein
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  Impact of age and sex on neural cardiovascular responsiveness to cold pressor test in humans.

Authors:  M L Keller-Ross; H A Cunningham; J R Carter
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Mental Stress Elicits Sustained and Reproducible Increases in Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity.

Authors:  Matthew D Muller; Charity L Sauder; Chester A Ray
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.