Literature DB >> 21956497

Unique strengths of ELISPOT for T cell diagnostics.

Paul V Lehmann1, Wenji Zhang.   

Abstract

The T cell system plays an essential role in infections, allergic reactions, tumor and transplant rejection, as well as autoimmune diseases. It does so by the selective engagement of different antigen-specific effector cell lineages that differentially secrete cytokines and other effector molecules. These T cell subsets may or may not have cytolytic activity, can preferentially migrate to different tissues, and display variable capabilities to expand clonally. The quest of T cell immune diagnostics is to understand which specific effector function and T cell lineage is associated with a given clinical outcome, be it positive or adverse. No single assay can measure all of the relevant parameters. In this chapter, we review the unique contributions that ELISPOT assays can make toward understanding T cell-mediated immunity. ELISPOT assays have an unsurpassed sensitivity in detecting low frequency antigen-specific T cells that secrete effector molecules, including granzyme and perforin. They provide robust, highly reproducible data - even by first time users. Because ELISPOT assays require roughly tenfold less cell material than flow cytometry, ELISPOT is ideally suited for all measurements requiring parallel testing under multiple conditions. These include defining (a) T cell reactivity to individual peptides of extensive libraries, thereby establishing the fine-specificity of the response, and determinant mapping; (b) reactivity to different concentrations of the antigen in serial dilutions to measure the avidity of the T cell response; or (c) different secretory products released by T cells which define their respective effector lineage/functions. Further, because T cells survive ELISPOT assays unaffected, they can be retested for the acquisition of additional information in follow-up assays. These strengths of ELISPOT assays the weaknesses of flow cytometry-based measurements. Thus, the two assays systems compliment each other in the quest to understand T cell-mediated immunity in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21956497     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-325-7_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  34 in total

Review 1.  Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches.

Authors:  Anantdeep Kaur; Olga Shimoni; Michael Wallach
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  The immune response to cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Miriam Ciáurriz; Amaya Zabalza; Lorea Beloki; Cristina Mansilla; Estela Pérez-Valderrama; Mercedes Lachén; Eva Bandrés; Eduardo Olavarría; Natalia Ramírez
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  ELISpot Assay for the Detection of ASFV-Specific Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ)-Producing Cells.

Authors:  Raquel Portugal
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Pushing the frontiers of T-cell vaccines: accurate measurement of human T-cell responses.

Authors:  Fadi Saade; Stacey Ann Gorski; Nikolai Petrovsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.217

5.  Ex-vivo whole blood secretion of interferon (IFN)-γ and IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are as sensitive as IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot for the detection of gluten-reactive T cells in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2·5(+) -associated coeliac disease.

Authors:  N Ontiveros; J A Tye-Din; M Y Hardy; R P Anderson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Meningococcal PorB induces a robust and diverse antigen specific T cell response as a vaccine adjuvant.

Authors:  Munir Mosaheb; Lee M Wetzler
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Personalized Cancer Vaccines: Clinical Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Colby S Shemesh; Joy C Hsu; Iraj Hosseini; Ben-Quan Shen; Anand Rotte; Patrick Twomey; Sandhya Girish; Benjamin Wu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  ELISPOTs Produced by CD8 and CD4 Cells Follow Log Normal Size Distribution Permitting Objective Counting.

Authors:  Alexey Y Karulin; Kinga Karacsony; Wenji Zhang; Oleg S Targoni; Ioana Moldovan; Marcus Dittrich; Srividya Sundararaman; Paul V Lehmann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Conditional ligands for Asian HLA variants facilitate the definition of CD8+ T-cell responses in acute and chronic viral diseases.

Authors:  Cynthia X L Chang; Anthony T Tan; Ming Yan Or; Kai Yee Toh; Pei Yiing Lim; Adeline S E Chia; Thomas M Froesig; Karen D Nadua; Hsueh-Ling J Oh; Hoe Nam Leong; Sine R Hadrup; Adam J Gehring; Yee-Joo Tan; Antonio Bertoletti; Gijsbert M Grotenbreg
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Single-Cell Analysis of the Periodontal Immune Niche in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  A C Belkina; M Azer; J J Lee; H H Elgaali; R Pihl; M Cleveland; J Carr; S Kim; C Habib; H Hasturk; J E Snyder-Cappione; B S Nikolajczyk
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 8.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.