Literature DB >> 21956213

Adjuvant therapy, not mammographic screening, accounts for most of the observed breast cancer specific mortality reductions in Australian women since the national screening program began in 1991.

Robert C Burton1, Robin J Bell, Geetha Thiagarajah, Christopher Stevenson.   

Abstract

There has been a 28% reduction in age-standardised breast cancer mortality in Australia since 1991 when the free national mammographic program (BreastScreen) began. Therefore, a comparative study between BreastScreen participation and breast cancer age specific mortality trends in Australia was undertaken for two time periods between 1991 and 2007, where women aged 50-59 and 60-69 years, who were invited to screen, were compared to women aged 40-49 and 70-79 years who were not invited, but who did have access to the program. There were mortality reductions in all four age groups between 1991-1992 and 2007, resulting in 5,849 (95% CI 4,979 to 6,718) fewer women dying of breast cancer than would have otherwise been the case. Women aged 40-49 years, who had the lowest BreastScreen participation (approximately 20%), had the largest mortality reduction: 44% (95% CI 34.8-51.2). Women aged 60-69 years, who had the highest BreastScreen participation (approximately 60%), had the smallest mortality reduction: 19% (95% CI 10.5-26.9). As BreastScreen participation by invited women aged 50-69 years only reached a maximum of about 55-60% in 1998-1999, a decline in mortality in Australian women cannot be attributed to BreastScreen prior to this time. Thus, almost 60% of the Australian decline in breast cancer mortality since 1991 cannot be attributed to BreastScreen. Therefore, mammographic screening cannot account for most of the reductions in breast cancer mortality that have occurred in Australian women since 1991 and may have contributed to over-diagnosis. Most, if not all, of the reductions can be attributed to the adjuvant hormonal and chemotherapy, which Australian women have increasingly received since 1986.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21956213     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1794-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  17 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  The global challenge of reducing breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Robert Burton; Robin Bell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Challenges to the early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in developing countries.

Authors:  Karla Unger-Saldaña
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  The Marmot report: accepting the poisoned chalice.

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.

Authors:  Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Sylviane Darquy; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Frédérique Papin-Lefebvre; Odile Jullian; Jérôme Viguier; Hélène Sancho-Garnier
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

7.  Performance of breast cancer screening methods and modality among Chinese women: a report from a society-based breast screening program (SBSP) in Shanghai.

Authors:  Miao Mo; Guang-Yu Liu; Ying Zheng; Lian-Fang Di; Ya-Jie Ji; Li-Lang Lv; Ying-Yao Chen; Wei-Jun Peng; Jie-Ru Zhu; Ping-Ping Bao; Jian-Hui Ding; Cai Chang; Jian-Feng Luo; Zhi-Gang Cao; Wang-Hong Xu; Zhi-Min Shao
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-06-24

8.  Racial disparities in survival and age-related outcome in postsurgery breast cancer patients in a new york city community hospital.

Authors:  Stacey Martindale; Awinder Singh; Hua Wang; Ashley Steinberg; Amer Homsi; Haidi Zhang; Alan Go; Peter Pappas
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-02-12

Review 9.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer: A review.

Authors:  Warwick Lee; Gudrun Peters
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2013-02-03

10.  Increasing Disadvantages in Cancer Survival in New Zealand Compared to Australia, between 2000-05 and 2006-10.

Authors:  J Mark Elwood; Phyu Sin Aye; Sandar Tin Tin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.