Literature DB >> 21956126

CHEK2*1100delC and risk of malignant melanoma: Danish and German studies and meta-analysis.

Maren Weischer1, Ida M Heerfordt, Stig E Bojesen, Thomas Eigentler, Claus Garbe, Martin Röcken, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Henrik Schmidt, Helle Klyver, Lars Bastholt, Børge G Nordestgaard.   

Abstract

It is possible that reduced function of DNA repair and cell-cycle control genes increases the individual susceptibility to malignant melanoma. As CHEK2 is a cell-cycle master controller, we tested the hypothesis that heterozygosity for the frameshift alteration CHEK2*1100delC is associated with increased risk of malignant melanoma. First, we performed case-control studies of 1,152 Danish and 752 German individuals with malignant melanoma compared with 9,142 Danish and 3,718 German controls. Second, we performed a meta-analysis of CHEK2*1100delC and malignant melanoma, involving 2,619 cases and 17,481 controls. Third, we examined the risk of malignant melanoma associated with CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in an analysis stratified for sun exposure, as well as for subtype and location on the body. The odds ratios for malignant melanoma for CHEK2(*)1100del heterozygotes compared with those for noncarriers were 2.01 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-3.91) in Danes, 1.42 (95% CI, 0.46-4.31) in Germans, and 1.79 (95% CI, 1.02-3.17) in Danes and Germans combined. In a meta-analysis, the odds ratio of malignant melanoma for CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes compared with that for noncarriers was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.07-3.05). Stratifications did not alter these results. CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes have a twofold risk of malignant melanoma compared with noncarriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21956126     DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  8 in total

1.  Current evidences on the XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and melanoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies.

Authors:  Yuanzhi Xu; Guangjun Jiao; Li Wei; Ning Wang; Yajun Xue; Jin Lan; Yajie Wang; Chuan Liu; Meiqing Lou
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Genetic Characterization of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Based on Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Pelin Ercoskun; Cigdem Yuce Kahraman; Guller Ozkan; Abdulgani Tatar
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2021-11-04

Review 3.  CHEK2 (∗) 1100delC Mutation and Risk of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Hale; Maren Weischer; Jong Y Park
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-11-06

4.  Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) Mutation in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Joanna Huszno; Zofia Kołosza
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2018-04-18

Review 5.  CHEK2 Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition: Stalemate Rather than Checkmate.

Authors:  Lenka Stolarova; Petra Kleiblova; Marketa Janatova; Jana Soukupova; Petra Zemankova; Libor Macurek; Zdenek Kleibl
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma using RNA sampled by tape strips: A study protocol.

Authors:  Ida M Heerfordt; Jeppe D Andersen; Peter A Philipsen; Linnea Langhans; Torben Tvedebrink; Grethe Schmidt; Thomas Poulsen; Catharina M Lerche; Niels Morling; Hans Christian Wulf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary forms of cancer in the era of next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Christine Stanislaw; Yuan Xue; William R Wilcox
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 8.  The Danish Melanoma Database.

Authors:  Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich; Siri Klausen; Eva Spaun; Grethe Schmidt; Dorte Gad; Inge Marie Svane; Henrik Schmidt; Henrik Frank Lorentzen; Else Helene Ibfelt
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.