Literature DB >> 21956057

Functional outcomes for surgically treated 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

Jason R Wild1, Ariana DeMers, Robert French, Melanie R Shipps, Patrick F Bergin, Dana Musapatika, Bradley A Jelen.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures remains challenging. This study retrospectively evaluated functional outcomes of locked plate fixation vs hemi-arthroplasty in 57 patients with 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures from 2003 to 2005 with a mean follow-up time of 35 months (range, 15.7-52.7 months). Mean patient age was 56.9 years (range, 29-81.7 years) for the open reduction and internal fixation group (n=42) and 66.4 years (range, 38.1-90 years) for hemiarthroplasty group (n=15). All 57 patients completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Euroqol EQ-5D, [corrected] and the visual analog pain scale. Range of motion, the Constant Score, and the UCLA Shoulder score were used to evaluate a subset of 33 patients. Forty-one patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group achieved union, and 1 had symptomatic avascular necrosis requiring subsequent hemiarthroplasty. Two patients had implant removal for impingement symptoms. In the hemiarthroplasty group, there was 1 revision for a loose prosthesis. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P=.023), Simple Shoulder Test (P=.012), patient satisfaction (P=.034), Constant Score (P=.008), Kelsh Adjusted Constant Score (P=.015), UCLA Shoulder score (P=.01), and range of motion (forward flexion, P=.002; abduction, P=.001) were significantly better in the open reduction and internal fixation group than the hemiarthroplasty group. No significant differences between the groups existed in terms of SF-12 (physical, P=.118; mental, P=.134), Euroqol EQ-5D [corrected] (P=.169), or visual analog pain scale scores (P=.135), but all trended toward better with open reduction and internal fixation. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21956057     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20110826-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Jiezhi Dai; Yimin Chai; Chunyang Wang; Gen Wen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-07

2.  A review of management options for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Chetan S Modi
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 3.  Effectiveness and Safety of Interventions for Treating Adults with Displaced Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Long Chen; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Venkat Kavuri; Blake Bowden; Neil Kumar; Doug Cerynik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  ORIF versus arthroplasty for open proximal humerus fractures: Nationwide Inpatient Sample data between 1998 and 2013.

Authors:  Anant Dixit; Frank S Cautela; Colin S Cooper; George A Beyer; James C Messina; Jeffrey E Mait; Neil V Shah; Bassel G Diebo; Carl B Paulino; William P Urban
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-22

6.  Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marieke E Brouwer; Inge H F Reininga; Mostafa El Moumni; Klaus W Wendt
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.693

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.