Literature DB >> 21955956

'Equivalence of care' in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?

Anna Charles1, Heather Draper.   

Abstract

In recent years, the principle of equivalence has been accepted in many countries as the standard against which healthcare provision for prisoners should be measured. There are several ways in which this principle can be interpreted, but current policy in the UK and elsewhere seems to focus on the measurement and achievement of equivalence in the process of healthcare provision. We argue that it is not appropriate to apply this interpretation to all aspects of prisoner healthcare, as it does not necessarily address the challenges inherent to the prisoner population and prison setting. Consequently equivalence of health outcomes should also be considered alongside processes in the interests of providing healthcare in prison that is equivalent to that outside prison.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21955956     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Expert perspectives on Western European prison health services: do ageing prisoners receive equivalent care?

Authors:  Wiebke Bretschneider; Bernice Simone Elger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  The development of equivalence as a mechanism to improve prison healthcare.

Authors:  Alex Till; Andrew Forrester; Tim Exworthy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A Community Standard: Equivalency of Healthcare in Australian Immigration Detention.

Authors:  Ryan Essex
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  A Human Rights Framework for Advancing the Standard of Medical Care for Incarcerated People in the United States in the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Brendan Saloner; Gabriel B Eber; Carolyn B Sufrin; Chris Beyrer; Leonard S Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2022-06

5.  Using telemedicine to improve access, cost and quality of secondary care for people in prison in England: a hybrid type 2 implementation effectiveness study.

Authors:  Chantal Edge; Julie George; Georgia Black; Michelle Gallagher; Aftab Ala; Shamir Patel; Simon Edwards; Andrew Hayward
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Equivalence, Justice, Injustice - Health and Social Care Decision Making in Relation to Prison Populations.

Authors:  Andrew Shepherd; Tom Hewson; Jake Hard; Russell Green; Jennifer Shaw
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-07-14

7.  Quality indicators and performance measures for prison healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Sue Bellass; Krysia Canvin; Kate McLintock; Nat Wright; Tracey Farragher; Robbie Foy; Laura Sheard
Journal:  Health Justice       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Incarcerated aboriginal women's experiences of accessing healthcare and the limitations of the 'equal treatment' principle.

Authors:  S Kendall; S Lighton; J Sherwood; E Baldry; E A Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-04-03

9.  Global Prison Health Care Governance and Health Equity: A Critical Lack of Evidence.

Authors:  Katherine E McLeod; Amanda Butler; Jesse T Young; Louise Southalan; Rohan Borschmann; Sunita Sturup-Toft; Anja Dirkzwager; Kate Dolan; Lawrence Kofi Acheampong; Stephanie M Topp; Ruth Elwood Martin; Stuart A Kinner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.