Literature DB >> 21955761

A multilevel analysis of examinee gender, standardized patient gender, and United States medical licensing examination step 2 clinical skills communication and interpersonal skills scores.

Monica M Cuddy1, Kimberly A Swygert, David B Swanson, Ann C Jobe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women typically demonstrate stronger communication skills on performance-based assessments using human raters in medical education settings. This study examines the effects of examinee and rater gender on communication and interpersonal skills (CIS) scores from the performance-based component of the United States Medical Licensing Examination, the Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) examination.
METHOD: Data included demographic and performance information for examinees that took Step 2 CS for the first time in 2009. The sample contained 27,910 examinees, 625 standardized patient/case combinations, and 278,776 scored patient encounters. Hierarchical linear modeling techniques were employed with CIS scores as the outcome measure.
RESULTS: Females tend to slightly outperform males on CIS, when other variables related to performance are taken into account. No evidence of an examinee and rater gender interaction effect was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of Step 2 CS CIS scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21955761     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6c05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  9 in total

1.  Gender and performance of community treatment assistants in Tanzania.

Authors:  Alexander Jenson; Catherine Gracewello; Harran Mkocha; Debra Roter; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila West
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Factors associated with performance in an internal medicine clerkship.

Authors:  Colleen Colbert; Tresa McNeal; Maybelline Lezama; Martha Chandler; Lisa Forrester; Austin Metting; Curtis Mirkes; Holly Van Cleave; Sonny Win; John D Myers
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

4.  How well does pre-service education prepare midwives for practice: competence assessment of midwifery students at the point of graduation in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tegbar Yigzaw; Firew Ayalew; Young-Mi Kim; Mintwab Gelagay; Daniel Dejene; Hannah Gibson; Aster Teshome; Jacqueline Broerse; Jelle Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Can we rely on simulated patients' satisfaction with their consultation for assessing medical students' communication skills? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  T Gude; H Grimstad; A Holen; T Anvik; A Baerheim; O B Fasmer; P Hjortdahl; P Vaglum
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Characteristics and Gender Differences in the Medical Interview Skills of Japanese Medical Students.

Authors:  Akiko Sugawara; Kazunobu Ishikawa; Ryo Motoya; Gen Kobayashi; Yoko Moroi; Tetsuhito Fukushima
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  Communication skills of medical students during the OSCE: Gender-specific differences in a longitudinal trend study.

Authors:  Joachim Graf; Robert Smolka; Elisabeth Simoes; Stephan Zipfel; Florian Junne; Friederike Holderried; Annette Wosnik; Anne M Doherty; Karina Menzel; Anne Herrmann-Werner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  Lauren Chong; Silas Taylor; Matthew Haywood; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2017-12-27

9.  Differential attainment at MRCS according to gender, ethnicity, age and socioeconomic factors: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ricky Ellis; Peter A Brennan; Amanda J Lee; Duncan Sg Scrimgeour; Jennifer Cleland
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 18.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.