Literature DB >> 21954271

Rubella vaccination of unknowingly pregnant women during mass campaigns for rubella and congenital rubella syndrome elimination, the Americas 2001-2008.

Carlos Castillo-Solórzano1, Susan E Reef, Ana Morice, Nancy Vascones, Ana Elena Chevez, Rosa Castalia-Soares, Carlos Torres, Carla Vizzotti, Cuauhtémoc Ruiz Matus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the significant teratogenicity of rubella virus and the use of a live-attentuated vaccine, pregnancy is a contraindication of receipt of rubella vaccine (RCV). Data collected from several countries that have observed susceptible women who had received RCV during pregnancy documented that no infant with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) has been born, so the risk is theoretical. As part of the regional initiative to eliminate rubella and CRS in the Americas, one of the key strategies was the vaccination of women of childbearing age. The implementation of mass vaccination campaigns targeting women of childbearing age in Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, and Paraguay provided an opportunity to further increase the body of knowledge on the safety of rubella vaccine if an unknowingly pregnant woman is vaccinated in early pregnancy.
METHODS: Using a standard protocol, women who were unknowingly pregnant or become pregnant ≤ 30 days after receiving RCV were evaluated to determine immunity status (eg, susceptible, immune, and unknown) at the time of vaccination. Susceptible pregnant women were observed to determine the outcome of the pregnancy. For pregnancies that resulted in live births, serum samples were obtained from the newborn for rubella immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody testing. If the newborn's serum sample was IgM positive, the infant was evaluated for manifestations of CRS.
RESULTS: During the period 2001-2008, 48748253 women of childbearing age were vaccinated in the region of the Americas, 39542253 (81%) of whom were vaccinated in the 6 selected countries. Of these women, 30139 (0.07%) were pregnant or became pregnant ≤1 month after receiving vaccine and were followed up. On the basis of serological evaluation, 2894 (10%) women were classified as susceptible at the time of vaccination; of their pregnancies, 1980 (90%) resulted in a live birth. Sera from 70 (3.5%) of these infants were rubella IgM antibody positive, but none of the infants had features of CRS as a result of rubella vaccination. The maximum theoretical risk for CRS following rubella vaccination of susceptible pregnant women was 0.2%. Conclusions. The results of these studies from 6 select countries provides additional evidence showing an absence of risk of CRS associated with administering rubella vaccine shortly before or during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21954271     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  14 in total

1.  Maternal immunisation: ethical issues.

Authors:  Marcel Verweij; Philipp Lambach; Justin R Ortiz; Andreas Reis
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Maternal vaccination: moving the science forward.

Authors:  Azure N Faucette; Benjamin L Unger; Bernard Gonik; Kang Chen
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  The safety of maternal immunization.

Authors:  Annette K Regan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prediction of probability of rubella based on eye outcomes (PORBEO Nomogram)-a cross-sectional sentinel surveillance of 1134 infants.

Authors:  Parul Chawla Gupta; Praveen Kumar-M; Jagat Ram; Sanjay Verma; Ravinder Kaur Sachdeva; Kuldeep Singh; Ashish Bavdekar; Sanjay Shah; Mahantesh Sangappa; Krishna R Murthy; Sridhar Santhanam; Deepa John; Devika Shanmugasundaram; R Sabrinathan; Manoj Murhekar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Differences in Establishment of Persistence of Vaccine and Wild Type Rubella Viruses in Fetal Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Ludmila Perelygina; Adebola Adebayo; Maureen Metcalfe; Joseph Icenogle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rubella immunity in women of childbearing age, eight years after the immunization program in iran.

Authors:  Rahim Barari Sawadkohi; Amin Zarghami; Fatemeh Izadpana; Mohammad Pournasrollah
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  Congenital anomalies: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.

Authors:  Malini DeSilva; Flor M Munoz; Mark Mcmillan; Alison Tse Kawai; Helen Marshall; Kristine K Macartney; Jyoti Joshi; Martina Oneko; Annette Elliott Rose; Helen Dolk; Francesco Trotta; Hans Spiegel; Sylvie Tomczyk; Anju Shrestha; Sonali Kochhar; Elyse O Kharbanda
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Vaccines for the 21st century.

Authors:  Isabel Delany; Rino Rappuoli; Ennio De Gregorio
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 12.137

Review 9.  Dismantling the Taboo against Vaccines in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Maurizio de Martino
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Assessing herd immunity against rubella in Japan: a retrospective seroepidemiological analysis of age-dependent transmission dynamics.

Authors:  Ryo Kinoshita; Hiroshi Nishiura
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.