Literature DB >> 21953982

Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies.

C Vogt1, H-G K Blaas, K Å Salvesen, S H Eik-Nes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if postmortem examinations of fetuses and infants change the diagnosis obtained at prenatal ultrasound and affect counseling of future pregnancies, and if there has been a change over recent years in the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 455 autopsies of fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies performed at Trondheim University Hospital between 1995 and 2004 and with a prenatal ultrasound examination performed at a tertiary referral center. The routine ultrasound examinations were performed by specially trained midwives and obstetricians, referral scans by fetal medicine experts and autopsies by consultant pathologists with experience in perinatal pathology. The results of this study were also compared with those of a previous similar study performed between 1985 and 1995, with fetuses and infants coming from the same population and diagnosed at the same center.
RESULTS: Of all cases analyzed during the study period, there was complete agreement between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in 84% (384/455), i.e. prenatal ultrasound diagnoses were supplemented by postmortem examinations in 16% (71/455). Autopsy findings in four of these cases influenced further counseling. There was agreement regarding the main diagnosis in 98% (445/455) of cases. In the previous 10-year period, there was complete agreement in 75% and the main diagnosis was correct in 90% of cases. These differences between the two time periods were statistically significant (P = 0.0004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The most frequent defects involved the central nervous system, heart and urinary tract. For these defects, detection rates for the main diagnoses were significantly better in 1995-2004 compared with in the previous 10-year period (P = 0.0125, P = 0.0111 and P = 0.0241, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of prenatal sonographic detection of developmental anomalies has increased in recent years. However, postmortem examination is still necessary to verify or improve the prenatal diagnosis and may influence future counseling.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21953982     DOI: 10.1002/uog.10106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

1.  Routine perinatal and paediatric post-mortem radiography: detection rates and implications for practice.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Alistair D Calder; Liina Kiho; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-11-08

Review 2.  Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-02

3.  [Confrontation between ultrasound and fetopathological examination following therapeutic abortion performed in a maternity clinic in Tunisia].

Authors:  Mehdi Kehila; Ahmed Halouani; Omar Touhami; Hassine Saber Abouda; Abdeljalil Khlifi; Rim Ben Hmid; Ines Benhassen; Aida Masmoudi; Mohamed Badis Chanoufi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-12-21

4.  Evaluation of prenatal central nervous system anomalies: obstetric management, fetal outcomes and chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Ann Gee Tan; Neha Sethi; Sofiah Sulaiman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Debost-Legrand; Hélène Laurichesse-Delmas; Christine Francannet; Isabelle Perthus; Didier Lémery; Denis Gallot; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Paediatric and perinatal postmortem imaging: the need for a subspecialty approach.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30

7.  Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy.

Authors:  Ozge Ozdemir; Figen Aksoy; Cihat Sen
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 8.  Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  S Addison; O J Arthurs; S Thayyil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.