BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the predictors of adherence separately for supervised and unsupervised exercise or in postmenopausal women over an extended time period. Here, we report the predictors of exercise adherence in the Alberta Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Prevention (ALPHA) Trial. METHODS: The ALPHA trial randomized 160 postmenopausal women in Calgary and Edmonton, Canada to anexercise intervention that consisted of an average of 200 min/wk of supervised (123 minutes) and unsupervised (77 minutes) exercise over a 1-year period. Baseline data were collected on demographic, health-related fitness, quality of life, and motivational variables from the theory of planned behavior. RESULTS: Participants completed an average of 95% of their supervised exercise and 79% of their unsupervised exercise. In multivariate analyses, 8.1% (P=.001) of the variance was explained for supervised exercise by being from Edmonton (β=0.22; P=.004) and older (β=0.15; P=.050). For unsupervised exercise, 21.1% (P<.001) of the variance was explained by being from Calgary (β=-0.39; P<.001), having a family history of breast cancer (β=0.21; P=.003), and having higher vitality (β=0.19; P=.011). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of adherence may differ for supervised and unsupervised exercise, moreover, predicting adherence to supervised exercise may be particularly difficult in well-controlled efficacy trials.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the predictors of adherence separately for supervised and unsupervised exercise or in postmenopausal women over an extended time period. Here, we report the predictors of exercise adherence in the Alberta Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Prevention (ALPHA) Trial. METHODS: The ALPHA trial randomized 160 postmenopausal women in Calgary and Edmonton, Canada to an exercise intervention that consisted of an average of 200 min/wk of supervised (123 minutes) and unsupervised (77 minutes) exercise over a 1-year period. Baseline data were collected on demographic, health-related fitness, quality of life, and motivational variables from the theory of planned behavior. RESULTS:Participants completed an average of 95% of their supervised exercise and 79% of their unsupervised exercise. In multivariate analyses, 8.1% (P=.001) of the variance was explained for supervised exercise by being from Edmonton (β=0.22; P=.004) and older (β=0.15; P=.050). For unsupervised exercise, 21.1% (P<.001) of the variance was explained by being from Calgary (β=-0.39; P<.001), having a family history of breast cancer (β=0.21; P=.003), and having higher vitality (β=0.19; P=.011). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of adherence may differ for supervised and unsupervised exercise, moreover, predicting adherence to supervised exercise may be particularly difficult in well-controlled efficacy trials.
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Cindy K Blair; Denise C Snyder; Richard Sloane; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-05-21
Authors: Hanna van Waart; Laurien M Buffart; Martijn M Stuiver; Wim H van Harten; Gabe S Sonke; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Terri S Armstrong; Marcia Y Shade; Ghislain Breton; Mark R Gilbert; Anita Mahajan; Michael E Scheurer; Elizabeth Vera; Ann M Berger Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Giuseppe Barone; Raffaele Zinno; Erika Pinelli; Francesco Benvenuti; Laura Bragonzoni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.390