Kyeong-Hye Jeong1, Bong Kyu Yoo. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Kyungsan, Kyungbuk, 712-749, Korea.
Abstract
AIM OF THE REVIEW: To systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of liraglutide for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in comparison to other mono- and combination therapies. METHOD: PubMed (any date) and EMBASE (all years) search was conducted with liraglutide as a search term. Phase III clinical trials retrieved by the two databases and resources posted in Drug@FDA website were evaluated with regard to outcomes of efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Eight Phase III clinical studies compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide to other monotherapies or combinations. Liraglutide as monotherapy in doses of 0.9 mg or above showed a significantly superior reduction in HbA1C compared to monotherapies with glimepiride or glyburide. When liraglutide was used as add-on therapy to glimepiride in doses of 1.2 mg or above, the reduction of HbA1C was greater than that in the combination therapy of glimepiride and rosiglitazone. However, liraglutide as add-on therapy to metformin failed to show benefit over combination of metformin and glimepiride. Triple therapy of using liraglutide in addition to metformin plus either glimepiride or rosiglitazone resulted in additional benefit in HbA1C reduction. Most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbance such as nausea, vomit, diarrhea, and constipation. During the eight clinical studies, six cases of pancreatitis and five cases of cancer were reported in liraglutide arm, whereas there was one case of each of pancreatitis in exenatide and glimepiride arms, respectively, and one case of cancer in metformin plus sitagliptin arm. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide is a new therapeutic option to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the present lack of evidence of durability of efficacy and long-term safety appear to limit its utility in the general treatment of type 2 diabetes at this time.
AIM OF THE REVIEW: To systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of liraglutide for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in comparison to other mono- and combination therapies. METHOD: PubMed (any date) and EMBASE (all years) search was conducted with liraglutide as a search term. Phase III clinical trials retrieved by the two databases and resources posted in Drug@FDA website were evaluated with regard to outcomes of efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Eight Phase III clinical studies compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide to other monotherapies or combinations. Liraglutide as monotherapy in doses of 0.9 mg or above showed a significantly superior reduction in HbA1C compared to monotherapies with glimepiride or glyburide. When liraglutide was used as add-on therapy to glimepiride in doses of 1.2 mg or above, the reduction of HbA1C was greater than that in the combination therapy of glimepiride and rosiglitazone. However, liraglutide as add-on therapy to metformin failed to show benefit over combination of metformin and glimepiride. Triple therapy of using liraglutide in addition to metformin plus either glimepiride or rosiglitazone resulted in additional benefit in HbA1C reduction. Most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbance such as nausea, vomit, diarrhea, and constipation. During the eight clinical studies, six cases of pancreatitis and five cases of cancer were reported in liraglutide arm, whereas there was one case of each of pancreatitis in exenatide and glimepiride arms, respectively, and one case of cancer in metformin plus sitagliptin arm. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide is a new therapeutic option to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the present lack of evidence of durability of efficacy and long-term safety appear to limit its utility in the general treatment of type 2 diabetes at this time.
Authors: Susan van Dieren; Joline W J Beulens; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diederick E Grobbee; Bruce Neal Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil Date: 2010-05
Authors: Lotte Bjerre Knudsen; Lars Wichmann Madsen; Søren Andersen; Kasper Almholt; Anne S de Boer; Daniel J Drucker; Carsten Gotfredsen; Frederikke Lihme Egerod; Anne Charlotte Hegelund; Helene Jacobsen; Søren Dyring Jacobsen; Alan C Moses; Anne-Marie Mølck; Henriette S Nielsen; Jette Nowak; Helene Solberg; Tu D L Thi; Milan Zdravkovic; Ulrik Moerch Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Birgitte N Friedrichsen; Nicole Neubauer; Ying C Lee; Vivian K Gram; Niels Blume; Jacob S Petersen; Jens H Nielsen; Annette Møldrup Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Angeles Mondragon; Daniel Davidsson; Styliana Kyriakoudi; Annika Bertling; Rosa Gomes-Faria; Patrizia Cohen; Stephen Rothery; Pauline Chabosseau; Guy A Rutter; Gabriela da Silva Xavier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J M Amate; T Lopez-Cuadrado; N Almendro; C Bouza; Z Saz-Parkinson; R Rivas-Ruiz; J Gonzalez-Canudas Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Fan Zhang; Meiyun Zhou; Shuangshuang Li; Jinhua Gu; Yuanyuan Qian; Sisi He; Li Hong; Linlin Sun; Xiaohua Zhang; Weigang Ji Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Laurent Azoulay; Kristian B Filion; Robert W Platt; Matthew Dahl; Colin R Dormuth; Kristin K Clemens; Madeleine Durand; David N Juurlink; Laura E Targownik; Tanvir C Turin; J Michael Paterson; Pierre Ernst Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-02-17