Literature DB >> 21951489

Mass distribution and rotational inertia of "microtype" and "freely mobile" middle ear ossicles in rodents.

Danielle Lavender1, Sergei N Taraskin, Matthew J Mason.   

Abstract

The middle ears of seven species of rodents, including four hamster species, were examined under light microscopy and through micro-CT imaging. Hamsters were found to possess a spectrum of ossicular morphologies ranging from something approaching "freely mobile" (Mesocricetus) to something nearer the "microtype" (Cricetulus), although no hamster has an orbicular apophysis of the malleus. Rats, mice and Calomyscus were found to have typically microtype ossicles. To explore the functional effects of these morphological differences, CT scan data were used to calculate the magnitudes of the moments of inertia and positions of the centres of mass and principal rotational axes for the malleus-incus complexes. Microtype species were found to have much greater ossicular inertias, relative to size, about the "anatomical axis" extending between anterior process of the malleus and short process of the incus; ossicular centres of mass were displaced further from this axis. Calculated inertial values were then put into an existing model of middle ear function (Hemilä et al., 1995), in order to see whether the more accurate data would improve predictions of upper hearing limits. For the rat and mouse they did, but this was not so for the hamster Mesocricetus. This might indicate that the inner rather than the middle ear limits hearing in this species, or might simply reflect other shortcomings of the model. Functional differences appear to exist even among rodent ears of the same general type, but the adaptive significance of these differences remains enigmatic.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951489     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

Review 1.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Evolutionary paths to mammalian cochleae.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-15

3.  Sound transmission along the ossicular chain in common wild-type laboratory mice.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Polina Varavva; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The middle ear of the pink fairy armadillo Chlamyphorus truncatus (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Chlamyphoridae): comparison with armadillo relatives using computed tomography.

Authors:  Ana P Basso; Nora S Sidorkewicj; Emma B Casanave; Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Mouse middle-ear forward and reverse acoustics.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis.

Authors:  Ayako Sakamoto; Yukiko Kuroda; Sho Kanzaki; Koichi Matsuo
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Are suspensory ligaments important for middle ear reconstruction?

Authors:  Eileen Y Brister; Robert H Withnell; Pavel Shevchenko; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A reexamination of the Carnivora malleus (Mammalia, Placentalia).

Authors:  John R Wible; Michelle Spaulding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Into the dark: patterns of middle ear adaptations in subterranean eulipotyphlan mammals.

Authors:  Daisuke Koyabu; Misato Hosojima; Hideki Endo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Functional anatomy of the middle and inner ears of the red fox, in comparison to domestic dogs and cats.

Authors:  Erich Pascal Malkemper; Matthew J Mason; Hynek Burda
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.610

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.