| Literature DB >> 21951382 |
Atsushi Takata1, Maiko Kato, Masayuki Nakamura, Takeo Yoshikawa, Shigenobu Kanba, Akira Sano, Tadafumi Kato.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing using next-generation technologies has been previously demonstrated to be able to detect rare disease-causing variants. Progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO) is an inherited mitochondrial disease that follows either autosomal dominant or recessive forms of inheritance (adPEO or arPEO). AdPEO is a genetically heterogeneous disease and several genes, including POLG1 and C10orf2/Twinkle, have been identified as responsible genes. On the other hand, POLG1 was the only established gene causing arPEO with mitochondrial DNA deletions. We previously reported a case of PEO with unidentified genetic etiology. The patient was born of a first-cousin marriage. Therefore, the recessive form of inheritance was suspected.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21951382 PMCID: PMC3308055 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r92
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Summary of the filtering to narrow down the candidates for the causal variant
| Criteria for the filtering | Number of remaining variants |
|---|---|
| Coding variants | 19, 215 |
| Not in dbSNP130 | 2, 015 |
| Not in eight HapMap exomes [ | 1, 833 |
| Not in in-house data of a healthy Japanese individual | 1, 336 |
| Functional (missense, nonsense, frameshift and splice site) | 592 |
| In run-of-homozygosity regions | 35 (in 33 genes) |
The filtering was performed using the listed criteria in descending order.
List of novel and functional variants in run-of-homozygosity regions
| Chromosome | Position | Reference allele | Variant allele | Variant calling/coverage | Gene | Amino acid change | PhyloP score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 103313660 | G | A | 58/58 | Pro33Ser | 6.741 | |
| 1 | 39620317 | G | A | 5/7* | Arg2523Gln; Arg3025Gln | 5.329 | |
| 4 | 107449465 | A | C | 63/63 | Asn34Lys | 5.199 | |
| 22 | 15980313 | C | T | 5/5* | Val569Ile | 4.997 | |
| 11 | 64117795 | G | A | 4/4* | Trp37Stp; Trp258Stp | 4.945 | |
| 10 | 29010439 | G | C | 24/24 | Gly108Ala | 4.878 | |
| 20 | 49482400 | G | A | 4/4* | Ala778Val | 4.437 | |
| 1 | 238437608 | C | T | 10/12 | Pro1101Leu | 3.804 | |
| 1 | 85362528 | T | - | 65/69 | Splice site | 3.503 | |
| 3 | 99094433 | A | G | 24/34 | Lys546Glu | 3.299 | |
| 3 | 336547 | T | G | 23/23 | Ser30Ala | 3.014 | |
| 3 | 46595758 | C | G | 27/40* | Arg41Gly | 2.522 | |
| 4 | 169335658 | A | C | 9/13* | Thr193Pro | 2.257 | |
| 5 | 140538797 | C | T | 127/127 | Thr333Ile | 2.011 |
Variants with PhyloP score > 2 are listed. Asterisks indicate variants with coverage < 8× or a variant calling/coverage ratio < 0.7; the reliability of these variant calls is generally lower than that of the others.
Figure 1The identified disease-associated variant in . (a) Partial sequence of RRM2B in the patient's DNA (left) and control DNA (right). Red squares indicate the base position of the g.341G > A, p.P33S variant. (b) The substituted amino acid residue (red box) is highly conserved across 44 vertebrate species (from the UCSC genome browser [31]).
List of novel, putatively functional and heterozygous variants in mitochondrial genes
| Chromosome | Position | Reference allele | Variant allele | Variant calling/coverage | Gene | Amino acid change | PhyloP score | Inheritance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 30615756 | G | C | 36/69 | Asp256His | 6.494 | Paternally inherited | |
| 10 | 104476790 | T | T | 14/30 | Leu73Pro | 4.906 | Maternally inherited | |
| 7 | 100670236 | C | C | 20/51 | Ala90Pro | 3.824 | Maternally inherited | |
| 11 | 47620527 | A | A | 3/8 | Tyr23His | 3.680 | Not confirmed in Sanger sequencing | |
| 1 | 10286026 | C | G | 22/46 | Ile732Met | 3.092 | Maternally inherited |
Variants with PhyloP score > 2 are listed.
Figure 2Relative amounts of mtDNA in skeletal muscle tissues from the patient and four control subjects. ND1/RNaseP and ND4/RNaseP ratios calculated by real-time quantitative PCR were used to evaluate mtDNA levels. The mtDNA level in the patient was comparable to those of controls. Values are relative to the average of all four controls.